Help with error analysis ly needed

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around error analysis in a physics experiment involving projectile motion. The original poster seeks assistance in calculating the errors associated with time (t) and range (x) after firing a metal ball at a specified angle and initial speed, while considering uncertainties in angle, height, and speed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster describes a series of calculations to determine errors using a functional approach, expressing confusion over the results. Some participants question the accuracy of the error calculations, particularly regarding the conversion of angle measurements from degrees to radians.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in identifying potential errors in the original poster's calculations. Guidance has been offered regarding the need to convert angle measurements and the use of calculus for error propagation, though no consensus has been reached on the overall approach or specific errors.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is instructed to ignore the uncertainty of the constant g, which may influence the calculations. There is also a mention of a preference for a functional approach over a calculus-based method for error analysis.

slasakai
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Help with error analysis! urgently needed

Homework Statement


Using the theoretical prediction of t, find the errors of both t and x, . The problem is based on an experiment I did in Labs, In which a small metal ball was fired at 40° (uncertainty 0.5°) to the horizontal, at a height,y= 1.095m (with uncertainty of 0.005m) and fired at another measured quantity of initial speed V=5.23 m/s(uncertainty of 0.01m/s). and t is the time taken to hit the ground and x is the range of the ball.


Homework Equations



y=y0 - (Vsinθ)t - (0.5g)t^2

using quadratic equation to solve for t

t=((Vsinθ+ sqrt((Vsinθ)^2 + (2gy))/g

and later plug in value of t
into equation x=(Vcos40)t for x

also we are instructed to ignore the uncertainty on the constant g

The Attempt at a Solution



putting in values t=0.926 s(3sf) and although I cannot type all of my working here, I used a series of steps calculating the errors on individual functions of the equation for t and slowly combining them, however it keeps resulting in an error of 1.17616421... which obviously cannot be correct as this is larger than the predicted value! I'm clearly making a mistake somewhere, a solution will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks gneill, I see how not including any working would make it difficult to find my mistake. I will try my best to describe the method I used here.

I used the functional approach to calculate all the errors, as I couldn't really understand the calculus method.

here goes:

1. I first calculated the error on sinθ, using α=abs(cosθ) * error on sinθ = 0.3830222216

2. Then the error on Vsinθ, using α=sqrt((errorV/V)^2 + (errorsinθ/sinθ)^2) * Vsinθ = 2.003216532

3. Then the error on (Vsinθ)^2 , α=abs(2*Vsinθ) * (error on Vsinθ) = 13.4687433 [this value is the one where I start to doubt myself]

4. Then I calculate the error on 2gy using α= abs(2g) * (error on value of y) = 0.0981
[wasnt completely sure about taking g to be a constant despite being told to ignore the uncertainty]

5. combining errors of the (Vsinθ)^2 + (2gy) using α= sqrt( errora^2 + errorb^2) = 13.46910059 [an obviously massive value]

6. propagating this error through a power of 0.5, using same functional approach = 1.176164221

7. finally adding the errors of everything under the sqrt sign and the Vsinθ outside it using

α= sqrt( errora^2 + errorb^2) gives such a ridiculous answer = appx 2.3, which is so wrong...

I know this was a bad way to write it out, but if anyone can follow it I would greatly appreciate it
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi slasakai. Welcome to Physics Forums.

There's not much we can do to find your error without seeing the work. But I can tell you that the result for the error in t should be closer to 0.001 seconds than 1 s.

If you're proficient with calculus and taking derivatives, you can find the error for the whole expression at once via:

$$\delta t = \sqrt{\left(\frac{df}{d \theta}\right)^2\delta \theta^2 +
\left(\frac{df}{dv}\right)^2\delta v^2 +
\left(\frac{df}{dy}\right)^2\delta y^2 }$$
where ##f(\theta, v, y)## is the function for the time that you found and the derivatives are taken to be partial derivatives. The ##\delta \theta, \delta v, ## and ##\delta y## are the measurement errors.
 
slasakai said:
1. I first calculated the error on sinθ, using α=abs(cosθ) * error on sinθ = 0.3830222216
That looks like the error (in degrees) of theta. That's not the error in sin theta. Need to convert to radians.
 
haruspex said:
That looks like the error (in degrees) of theta. That's not the error in sin theta. Need to convert to radians.

thank you so mcuh haruspex, you have literally helped me so much by spotting that error. It was driving me nuts trying to figure out where I'd one wrong
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
731
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
813
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
894
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K