MHB Help with exponential function word problem

AI Thread Summary
The exponential function for the number of bacteria is given by B(t) = 40e^(0.6t). After substituting t = 2, the correct calculation shows B(2) = 40e^(1.2), which simplifies to approximately 132.8. The confusion arose from misinterpreting B(2) as a multiplication rather than a function notation. The final answer should be stated as 132.8 bacteria, not days. Understanding function notation is crucial in solving such problems accurately.
linapril
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
The number of bacteria in a culture is given by B(t) = 40e0.6t, where t is the time in days.
How many bacteria are there after 2 days?
I substituted t = 2, and got this:

2B = 40e1.2
which I simplified to become this
B = 66.4 days

Apparently this answer is wrong though, can someone explain why?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
linapril said:
The number of bacteria in a culture is given by B(t) = 40e0.6t, where t is the time in days.
How many bacteria are there after 2 days?
I substituted t = 2, and got this:

2B = 40e1.2
which I simplified to become this
B = 66.4 days

Apparently this answer is wrong though, can someone explain why?

Hi linapril! :)

After substitution you have B(2) = 40e1.2
The left side B(2) is not a multiplication.
B(2) is a special notation that represents the number of bacteria after 2 days.
We say that B is a function of time.

So your answer is just 40e1.2 = 132.8 days.
 
However, the answer is NOT "132.8 days" it is, rather, 132.8 bacteria.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top