MHB Help with finding the determinant using gaussian elimination

brunette15
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
I attempting to find the determinant using gaussian elimination for the following matrix [1 2 3; 3 2 2; 0 9 8].
I have begun by attempting to form zeros below the diagonal. My first row operation was to make row 2 equal to 3(row 1) - row 2. This gives me [1 2 3; 0 4 7; 0 9 8] . I think i am making a small mistake whenever i try to continue from here, anyone have any suggestions as to what to do from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brunette15 said:
I attempting to find the determinant using gaussian elimination for the following matrix [1 2 3; 3 2 2; 0 9 8].
I have begun by attempting to form zeros below the diagonal. My first row operation was to make row 2 equal to 3(row 1) - row 2. This gives me [1 2 3; 0 4 7; 0 9 8] . I think i am making a small mistake whenever i try to continue from here, anyone have any suggestions as to what to do from here?

The correct procedure starts adding to the row 2 the row 1 multiplied by -3 so that you first obtain from [1 2 3; 3 2 2; 0 9 8] the matrix [1 2 3; 0 -4 -7; 0 9 8]. Then You add to the row 3 the row 2 multiplied by 9/4 obtaining [1 2 3; 0 -4 -7; 0 0 - 31/4] , so that the determinant is 31...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top