Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Help with indirect logic proof please!

  1. Mar 28, 2012 #1
    Using the five axioms below prove: p→q

    A1: p→~y
    A2: ~r→q
    A3: p→~z
    A4: x→ q or z
    A5: r→x or y

    Do I have to take the contrapositive of some of the axioms to begin this proof?
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 28, 2012 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Yes, that would be the simplest thing to do. The very first "axiom" gives you p-> ~y but there is no "~y-> " so you cannot continue directly. However, you do have "A5: r->x or y which has contrapositive ~(x or y)= (~x) and (~y)->~r and then both "A2: ~r-> q" and "A4: x-> q or z".
  4. Mar 28, 2012 #3
    Am I on the right track with this?

    Conclusions Justifications
    1. p Given
    2. ~z or ~y All cases
    3. ~z Case 1
    4. ~x A4
    5. ~r A5
    6. q A2
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Help with indirect logic proof please!
  1. Logic help (Replies: 0)

  2. Logic in proofs (Replies: 4)