Help with Newton's Law of Gravitation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the net gravitational force on Mass A due to two other masses, B and C, each weighing 2.00 kg. The gravitational force formula used is F(g) = G * (m(1)m(2))/(r^2), with G being 6.674e-11 N(m/kg)^2. Participants confirm that the correct approach is to calculate the forces between A & C and A & B separately, then sum these forces. The final calculated net force on Mass A is approximately 2.807e-8 N directed to the right.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Law of Gravitation
  • Familiarity with gravitational force calculations
  • Knowledge of significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of Newton's Law of Gravitation
  • Practice calculating gravitational forces with varying mass and distance
  • Explore the concept of significant figures in physics calculations
  • Learn about vector addition in physics for net force calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching gravitational concepts, and anyone interested in mastering gravitational force calculations.

SoulInNeed
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
1. Find the magnitude and direction of the net gravitational force on Mass A due to masses B and C in Figure 6.27. Each mass is 2.00 kg.

The figure looks like this:
A<----------->(10 cm distance)C<-------------------------->(40 cm distance)B



2.F(g)=G * (m(1)m(2))/(r^2)



3.I'm thinking of two ways to do this, one would be just include all 3 masses and the final distance between A & B, which would be 6.674e^-11 * (2 *2 *2)/(.50 m^2), which is 2.14e-9 to the right.

However, I could just do the two separately between A & C, and A & B, and just add them, or I could do A & C, and C & B, and just add them. Not too sure here, thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SoulInNeed said:
3.I'm thinking of two ways to do this, one would be just include all 3 masses and the final distance between A & B, which would be 6.674e^-11 * (2 *2 *2)/(.50 m^2), which is 2.14e-9 to the right.
:bugeye:

However, I could just do the two separately between A & C, and A & B, and just add them,
Now you're cooking.

or I could do A & C, and C & B, and just add them.
Why C & B? You only care about the force on A, not between C and B.
 
SoulInNeed said:
3.I'm thinking of two ways to do this, one would be just include all 3 masses and the final distance between A & B, which would be 6.674e^-11 * (2 *2 *2)/(.50 m^2), which is 2.14e-9 to the right.

No, don't go that way. :eek: That's not the way the math works.

However, I could just do the two separately between A & C, and A & B, and just add them,

There you go! try that one. :approve:

or I could do A & C, and C & B, and just add them. Not too sure here, thanks for any help!

Yell, that last approach won't help you either. The problem statement is asking you the gravitational force on A, caused by the others. The gravitational force between C and B isn't relevant to the particular problem.

[Edit:] Looks like Doc Al beat me to it.
 
OK, so would it be, A & C 6.674e-11 * (2 *2)/.1^2, which would be 2.7e-8.

Then, I would do A & B 6.674e-11 * (2 *2)/.5^2, which would be 1.07e-9.

Add them together and it's 2.807e-8. Can someone double check this? For the second part of the problem, I used .5m as the distance between A & B.
 
SoulInNeed said:
OK, so would it be, A & C 6.674e-11 * (2 *2)/.1^2, which would be 2.7e-8.

Then, I would do A & B 6.674e-11 * (2 *2)/.5^2, which would be 1.07e-9.

Add them together and it's 2.807e-8. Can someone double check this? For the second part of the problem, I used .5m as the distance between A & B.

You might want want to redo you final result (i.e. plugging in the numbers), keeping better track of significant digits, But yes, I believe you are essentially correct. :cool:
 
collinsmark said:
You might want want to redo you final result (i.e. plugging in the numbers), keeping better track of significant digits, But yes, I believe you are essentially correct. :cool:
Yeah, I was in a bit of a hurry, lol.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K