Help with Notation: Understanding x(.) & C(.)

  • Thread starter Thread starter emergentecon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding specific mathematical notation, particularly the use of x(.) and C(.), which appears to denote functions with unspecified arguments. Participants express confusion regarding the meaning and implications of this notation in the context of functions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants inquire about the meaning of x(.) and C(.), questioning how these notations relate to functions and their arguments. Some suggest that it indicates a univariate function, while others explore the implications of functions taking single versus multiple arguments.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the notation, with some participants providing insights into its meaning and potential interpretations. A formal explanation has been shared, but there remains a lack of consensus on the broader implications of the notation in different contexts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention that the dot notation may indicate functions that can take various forms of arguments, including vectors or even functions themselves, which adds complexity to the understanding of the notation.

emergentecon
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Having trouble understanding some notation:

x(.) or C(.) (the dot is in fact in the center i.e mid-way vertically in the brackets).

I have never run into this before? What does it mean if x is a function of "."?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
emergentecon said:
Having trouble understanding some notation:

x(.) or C(.) (the dot is in fact in the center i.e mid-way vertically in the brackets).

I have never run into this before? What does it mean if x is a function of "."?
More context please.
 
haruspex said:
More context please.
Apologies, I thought it was something along the lines of f' being the first derivative of the function, and nothing else (to my knowledge).

And I quote "C(.) is a choice rule (technically a correspondence) that assigns a nonempty set of chosen elements C(β) ⊂ β for every budget set β ∈ B."
 
emergentecon said:
Apologies, I thought it was something along the lines of f' being the first derivative of the function, and nothing else (to my knowledge).

And I quote "C(.) is a choice rule (technically a correspondence) that assigns a nonempty set of chosen elements C(β) ⊂ β for every budget set β ∈ B."
Seems like it is just a way of saying "C is a function".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: emergentecon
haruspex said:
Seems like it is just a way of saying "C is a function".
Ok, thanks!
 
haruspex said:
Seems like it is just a way of saying "C is a function".
Someone has mentioned to me that it indicates that a function can only take a single argument . . . without specifying the specific argument?
Not sure if this is true.
 
emergentecon said:
Having trouble understanding some notation:

x(.) or C(.) (the dot is in fact in the center i.e mid-way vertically in the brackets).

I have never run into this before? What does it mean if x is a function of "."?

I got a formal answer:

f(.) means that we have a univariate (one variable) function.
The difference between f(x) and f(.) is that that, f(x) denotes a univariate function depending from the specific one-variable x, whilst f(.) denotes an one variable function depending from any one-variable we like.
We can write, for instance, f(x) or f(y) or f(z) etc
 
emergentecon said:
I got a formal answer:

f(.) means that we have a univariate (one variable) function.
The difference between f(x) and f(.) is that that, f(x) denotes a univariate function depending from the specific one-variable x, whilst f(.) denotes an one variable function depending from any one-variable we like.
We can write, for instance, f(x) or f(y) or f(z) etc

Be very careful about what you regard as a "variable". I have seen functions C(.) whose arguments are n-vectors, so we really have ##C(x_1,x_2, \ldots x_n)##, but with the n arguments bundled together into a single "vector" ##\vec{x} = (x_1,x_2 \ldots,x_n)##. In that sense, C is a function of the single "variable} ##\vec{x}##. I have also seen functions C(.) whose arguments are functions themselves (such things are usually called functionals), so in a sense are functions of infinitely many variables. But, again, these several variables are all bundled together into a single object ##x(.)##, and that is plugged into the formula for C.
 
The dot notation is often used when you want to define a function from one that's already defined, without coming up with a new function symbol. For example, if ##f:\mathbb R^2\to\mathbb R## and ##y\in\mathbb R##, then ##f(\cdot,y)## denotes the function ##x\mapsto f(x,y)## with domain ##\mathbb R##, i.e. the function ##g:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R## such that ##g(x)=f(x,y)## for all ##x\in\mathbb R##. So for all ##x\in\mathbb R##, we have ##f(\cdot,y)(x)=f(x,y)##. The dot is just telling you where to put the "input".
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K