Specifying vertical asymptotes in periodic functions in set notation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the specification of vertical asymptotes and the domain of periodic functions using set notation. The original poster presents a scenario involving a periodic function with a period of π/2 and a vertical asymptote at π/4, seeking clarification on the correctness of their proposed notation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to define the domain of a periodic function while excluding vertical asymptotes using set notation. Some participants confirm the validity of the proposed notation and explore specific values of n to illustrate the exclusion of asymptotes.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's question, providing feedback on the notation and discussing the implications of the values of n. There is a productive exchange of ideas regarding the use of symbols and notation in mathematical expressions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the relevance of the inequality −2π < x < 2π mentioned by the original poster, indicating a potential constraint or context for the discussion.

SubZer0
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
What is the general format for specifying recurring vertical asymptotes in periodic functions in set notation?
Relevant Equations
-2pi < x < 2pi
Hi all,

What is the general set notation for specifying a vertical asymptote and domain for a periodic function? For example, if I have a periodic function which has a period of pi/2, and within that period, a vertical asymptote occurs at pi/4. The domain is R, excluding that vertical asymptote. I am presuming that I can specify it something like:

{ x: x ∈ R, x ≠ n⋅(pi/2)+(pi/4) }, where n is an integer.

Does this look correct, or completely off?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SubZer0 said:
Hi all,

What is the general set notation for specifying a vertical asymptote and domain for a periodic function? For example, if I have a periodic function which has a period of pi/2, and within that period, a vertical asymptote occurs at pi/4. The domain is R, excluding that vertical asymptote. I am presuming that I can specify it something like:

{ x: x ∈ R, x ≠ n⋅(pi/2)+(pi/4) }, where n is an integer.

Does this look correct, or completely off?

Thanks!
Looks OK to me. An example of a function with this behavior is ##f(x) = \tan(2x)##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SubZer0
SubZer0 said:
Hi all,

What is the general set notation for specifying a vertical asymptote and domain for a periodic function? For example, if I have a periodic function which has a period of pi/2, and within that period, a vertical asymptote occurs at pi/4. The domain is R, excluding that vertical asymptote. I am presuming that I can specify it something like:

{ x: x ∈ R, x ≠ n⋅(pi/2)+(pi/4) }, where n is an integer.

Does this look correct, or completely off?

Thanks!
Let's check it out.
If n=0, then you are excluding π/4 from the domain. That's good.

If n=1, then you are excluding 3π/4 from the domain. That's good.

If n = −1, then you are excluding −π/4 from the domain. That's good.

Etc.

I'm curious about the inequality, −2pi < x < 2pi , that you have in the Relevant Equations .

Also, you can find many symbols by clicking on the icon 3rd from the right in the light blue banner at the top of the "Reply/Post thread" box.

242415

Using that, your result of
{ x: x ∈ R, x ≠ n⋅(pi/2)+(pi/4) }
becomes:
{ x: x ∈ ℝ, x ≠ n⋅(π/2)+(π/4) }

Even better, use LaTeX.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SubZer0
Thanks, Mark44 and SammyS for your responses. Have taken on board your advice for the symbols for future posts, SammyS.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K