Help with probability distribution for description of particle sizes

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the appropriate probability distribution for describing the sizes of nanoparticles, specifically focusing on fitting a histogram of measured sizes. The context includes considerations of asymmetry in the distribution and the influence of crystal lattice constants on particle size.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the measured size distribution of nanoparticles is asymmetrical with a tail toward larger sizes and questions which probability distribution would be suitable for fitting the data.
  • Another participant suggests considering the Gamma distribution as a potential fit for the data.
  • A different participant expresses curiosity about the naturalness of the Gamma distribution for size distributions and discusses its interpretation in terms of exponential random variables.
  • One participant revisits the lognormal distribution after trying a different fitting command, indicating that it may not fit poorly and plans to explore further with different datasets.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus on the best probability distribution for the nanoparticle size data, as multiple distributions (Gamma and lognormal) are being considered and debated.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the fitting process, including potential issues with the software used for analysis and the influence of crystal lattice constants on the interpretation of size distributions.

Who May Find This Useful

Researchers and practitioners in the fields of nanotechnology, materials science, and statistics may find this discussion relevant, particularly those interested in statistical modeling of size distributions.

katkak
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I study nanoparticles. Basically, they are prepared by being "etched away" from larger chunks of material. I need to describe their sizes, i.e. fit the histogram of measured sizes, with a probability distribution. The measured distribution is clearly asymmetrical with a tail toward larger sizes (see the attached picture, histograms with much higher numbers of occurrences have basically the same shape).

(i) Which probability distribution is suitable for the description of these data?

When trying to fit the data using common distributions (Gauss/Lorentz clearly don't fit very well, lognormal), Poisson seems to be the best match (just judging from the shape).

(ii) Should the distribution be discrete or continuous?

At such small sizes (4 nm) the crystal lattice constant (0.54 nm) becomes significant (i.e. approx. 8 crystal lattices per particle), but the size is also influenced by the rearrangement of atoms at the surface and the surface termination. So, the size is not just "integer multiple" of the crystal lattice constant.
 

Attachments

  • Graph1-ostre.jpg
    Graph1-ostre.jpg
    37.6 KB · Views: 439
Physics news on Phys.org
(this questions belongs in the stats forum)

Have you tried the Gamma distribution?
 
Thanks, seems to be quite nice. I didn't know this distribution. Is it "natural" for a size distribution to behave as Gamma distribution?
 
Well, for integer shape parameters the gamma distribution can be interpreted as a sum of exponential random variables so I don't know if that helps.

Also, are you sure the distribution is not lognormal?
 
I tried the lognormal fit again using a different command in the software (I use Origin, which is sometimes a bit unpredictable) and it doesn't not seem so bad. I'll try to do some more fitting with different datasets and see which distribution fits better.

Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K