Help with the following inequality

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evagelos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a specific inequality involving three positive variables, x, y, and z. Participants explore potential methods for proving the inequality, discuss conditions, and share their approaches to tackling the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the inequality and seeks assistance in proving it.
  • Another participant questions the appeal of the inequality and suggests assuming x ≥ y ≥ z to simplify the problem.
  • A participant clarifies that the only condition for the inequality is that x, y, z are all greater than zero.
  • Suggestions are made to find a common denominator and expand the polynomials to match terms.
  • One participant expresses that the inequality is complex and lacks homogeneity, making it difficult to derive additional constraints.
  • A change of variables is proposed by a participant, introducing new variables to potentially simplify the inequality.
  • Another participant expresses confusion regarding the proposed change of variables and seeks clarification.
  • A suggestion is made to use mathematical software for symbolic expansion and verification of coefficients on both sides of the inequality.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a specific method for proving the inequality, and multiple approaches are discussed without agreement on a definitive solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the inequality and the lack of homogeneity, which may limit the application of certain mathematical techniques. There is also uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of the proposed change of variables.

evagelos
Messages
314
Reaction score
0
please help with the following inequality:



.....[(x+y)(y+z)(z+x) +xy+xz+yz]/xyz >=
.....(3xy+3xz+3yz+x^2+y^2+z^2)/[(x+y)(y+z)(z+x)]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


That doesn't look like a very appealing inequality. Is there a condition for this inequality? I guess you could try dumbassing it by assuming x >= y >= z since the inequality is symmetric in x,y,z and then cross multiplying but I haven't figured out a nice solution yet.
 


thanks for the quick respond the only condition is that x>0,y>0,z>0
 


What have you tried?
 


I would suggest, if x,y,z are positive, that you just get a common denominator and multiply the numerators out into expanded polynomials, then match up the terms.
 


Yeah just as I had guessed, the inequality is basically just multiplying out, moving everything to one side, and relying on the fact that the sum of positive real numbers is greater than 0.

That is really a nasty inequality. It's symmetric but that doesn't make anything better. It's not homogeneous, so we can't come up with any additional constraints. It doesn't rely on any clever manipulations or other well-known inequalities (unless you count a simple albeit important fact). It's somewhat instructive but taken in perspective it's no where near as instructive as the other inequality you posed.
 


so what do we do now?
 


Give me a solid proof please
 


The change of variables:

[tex]s = x + y + z, t = xyz, w = 1/x + 1/y + 1/z[/tex]

might help. Note that [tex](x + y)(y + z)(x + z) = swt - t[/tex] and [tex]xy + xz + yz = tw[/tex]. The inequality becomes: [tex]sw + w - 1 \geq (s^2 + 2tw)/(stw - t)[/tex], if my calculations aren't off. Also note that [tex]sw \geq 1[/tex].
 
  • #10


cellotim you mixed up worst now
 
  • #11


Does this mean that I made a mistake or that I've confused you more?

If you want to know how I would solve this problem for a class, I would sit down at Maple or Mathematica, cross-multiply the denominators, and have the computer symbolically expand each side (in x,y,z), then I would make sure that all the coefficients on the LHS are bigger than all the coefficients on the RHS. It would be a huge mess, but it would get it done. I don't know if you have access to any maths software, but that is how I would do it. (Of course you can do it all or partially by hand if you need to show that work. It wouldn't take more than 30-1hr.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K