Help with total capacitance in parallel and in series

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the total capacitance required in a timer circuit for an elevator door, specifically addressing how to achieve a target capacitance of 33.0 µF using existing capacitors of 35.4 µF and 32.5 µF. Participants explore whether to add additional capacitors in series or parallel to meet the specifications.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the appropriate configuration (series or parallel) for adding capacitors to achieve the desired capacitance. There are attempts to clarify the calculation methods for combining capacitors, with some questioning the correctness of their approaches and the underlying principles.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the methods used, suggesting that the original poster may have misunderstood the rules for combining capacitors. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of using series versus parallel configurations, with no explicit consensus reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the calculations and the application of the rules for combining capacitors, indicating a need for further clarification on these concepts.

complexc25
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
According to its design specification, the timer circuit delaying the closing of an elevator door is to have a capacitance of 33.0 µF between two points A and B.
(a) When one circuit is being constructed, the inexpensive but durable capacitor installed between these two points is found to have capacitance 35.4 µF. To meet the specification, one additional capacitor can be placed between the two points. To meet the specification, one additional capacitor can be placed between the two points. Should it be in series or in parallel with the 35.4 µF capacitor? (in series)

What should be its capacitance?

(b) The next circuit comes down the assembly line with capacitance 32.5 µF between A and B. What additional capacitor should be installed in series or in parallel in that circuit, to meet the specification? (parallel)

a) Ct = C1 +C2
33uF = 35.4uF + C2
isn't C2 = 33fF - 34.5uF ??

b) (1/Ct) = (1/C1) + (1/C2)
isn't (1/C2) = (1/33uf) - (1/32.5uF) ??

Im lost here...any help will be apprecieated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a you have the right answers, but you did the method wrong. How did you manage to do that? Series capacitors add like parallel resistances and parallel add like series resistances. Swap your two procedures and you should be good.
 
complexc25 said:
According to its design specification, the timer circuit delaying the closing of an elevator door is to have a capacitance of 33.0 µF between two points A and B.
(a) When one circuit is being constructed, the inexpensive but durable capacitor installed between these two points is found to have capacitance 35.4 µF. To meet the specification, one additional capacitor can be placed between the two points. To meet the specification, one additional capacitor can be placed between the two points. Should it be in series or in parallel with the 35.4 µF capacitor? (in series)

What should be its capacitance?

Consider the two calculation rules for combining capacitors in series and in parallel. You want the effective capacitance, as the result of putting two capacitors together, to be lower than the capacitance of the single capacitor presently in use. Which combination will allow you to come up with smaller capacitance?

(b) The next circuit comes down the assembly line with capacitance 32.5 µF between A and B. What additional capacitor should be installed in series or in parallel in that circuit, to meet the specification? (parallel)

This is a similar question, but now you want to end up with a larger effective capacitance. Will a series or a parallel combination get you a higher value?
 
thanx for the quick reply guys...dynamicsolo, i should have thought about both of ur conclusions...im dumb :s
 
complexc25 said:
thanx for the quick reply guys...dynamicsolo, i should have thought about both of ur conclusions...im dumb :s

Don't take it as a sign of being dumb -- unfortunately, equations and formulas in courses like these are not always taught with consideration of what happens to the numbers put into them...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K