Help with work and vector forces

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle of mass 1 kg subjected to a force defined by F = 5i + 15t^2j N, where t represents time in seconds. The initial velocity of the particle is given as 2i + 3j + 4k ms^−1. Participants are tasked with finding the work done by the force and the increase in kinetic energy over the time interval from 0 to 1 second.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of the force equation to find velocity and subsequently kinetic energy. There are questions about the correct limits for integration and whether to consider initial velocity when calculating final kinetic energy. Some participants suggest using the dot product of force and velocity to find work done.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of how to calculate final velocity and kinetic energy. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between work and kinetic energy, but there is no explicit consensus on the final approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of integrating force to find velocity and kinetic energy, with some confusion about the role of initial velocity in these calculations. The discussion reflects a mix of understanding and uncertainty regarding the application of physics principles in this context.

Heisenburger
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass 1 kg moves under the force F = 5i + 15t^2j N, where t is in seconds. The initial velocity of the particle is 2i + 3j + 4k ms^−1. Find the work done by the force acting on the particle, and the increase in kinetic energy of the particle , during the time 0 ≤ t ≤ 1.

Homework Equations



F=ma or F=m(dv/dt)?

The Attempt at a Solution



i attempted to use the F=m(dv/dt) and put it equal to the force,

so 1(dv/dt)=5i+15t^2, then i integrated to get dx/dt=5ti+15/3*t^3,

I then added the initial velocity of 2i+3j+4k, so now had 5ti+15/3*t^3 +2i+3j+4k,

now i am thinking this is wrong, but my next plan was to integrate this again, with the limits of 0 to 1?

am i on the right track?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you integrate 1(dv/dt), it should be from t = 0 to t=1. This gives you how much velocity is gained due to the force, and you can add this value to the initial velocity.
 
Hollumber said:
When you integrate 1(dv/dt), it should be from t = 0 to t=1. This gives you how much velocity is gained due to the force, and you can add this value to the initial velocity.

So, would that tell me the final velocity?

could that then be used to work out kinetic energy?

what about the work?

Thanks!
 
Yes, adding the velocity due to the force to initial velocity gives final velocity.
Yes, this can be converted into KE.
Work is equal to the difference of KE's.
 
Heisenburger said:

Homework Statement



A particle of mass 1 kg moves under the force F = 5i + 15t^2j N, where t is in seconds. The initial velocity of the particle is 2i + 3j + 4k ms^−1. Find the work done by the force acting on the particle, and the increase in kinetic energy of the particle , during the time 0 ≤ t ≤ 1.

Homework Equations



F=ma or F=m(dv/dt)?

The Attempt at a Solution



i attempted to use the F=m(dv/dt) and put it equal to the force,

so 1(dv/dt)=5i+15t^2, then i integrated to get dx/dt=5ti+15/3*t^3,

I then added the initial velocity of 2i+3j+4k, so now had 5ti+15/3*t^3 +2i+3j+4k,

now i am thinking this is wrong, but my next plan was to integrate this again, with the limits of 0 to 1?

am i on the right track?

Thanks!

You are definitely on the right track. You can continue by first combining terms on the velocity so that you have the results in the form ai+bj+ck. The rate at which work is being done at any time is equal to the force F dotted with the velocity vector. Evaluate this dot product, and then integrate with respect to t. What is the formula for the change in KE in terms of the initial and the final velocity?

Chet
 
Hollumber said:
Yes, adding the velocity due to the force to initial velocity gives final velocity.
Yes, this can be converted into KE.
Work is equal to the difference of KE's.

shall i leave the KE in vector form? or find the magnitude?

and for work do i do vector after-vector before then find magnitude or find the magnitudes and then take away?

THANKS!
 
Heisenburger said:
shall i leave the KE in vector form? or find the magnitude?

and for work do i do vector after-vector before then find magnitude or find the magnitudes and then take away?

THANKS!

Kinetic energy is a scalar, not a vector. KE is m(velocity dot velocity)/2. Calculate KE after and KE before, and then subtract.
 
Chestermiller said:
Kinetic energy is a scalar, not a vector. KE is m(velocity dot velocity)/2. Calculate KE after and KE before, and then subtract.

so, do i take the original equation for force, divide it by m (1) and integrate (with the limits of 1 & 0), to get the final velocity?

then FIRSTLY take the original velocity away from this new velocity, square that, multiply by m/2 to get KE.

Then SECONDLY take the original velocity, square it, multiply by m/2 then i have the original KE.

Then find out the difference, and that's the work?
 
Last edited:
Heisenburger said:
so, do i take the original equation for force, divide it by m (1) and integrate (with the limits of 1 & 0), to get the final velocity?
You already did that for arbitrary t.
then FIRSTLY take the original velocity away from this new velocity, square that, multiply by m/2 to get KE.
No. This is not the final KE. The final KE is just the final velocity squared multiplied by m/2. It does not depend on the initial velocity.

Then SECONDLY take the original velocity, square it, multiply by m/2 then i have the original KE.
Yes. So why didn't you suggest this same algorithm for the final KE?
Then find out the difference, and that's the work?
The difference is the work, but you're also supposed to show that the dot product of the force and the velocity integrated from t = 0 to t = 1 gives the identical result.
 
  • #10
Chestermiller said:
You already did that for arbitrary t.

No. This is not the final KE. The final KE is just the final velocity squared multiplied by m/2. It does not depend on the initial velocity.Yes. So why didn't you suggest this same algorithm for the final KE?

The difference is the work, but you're also supposed to show that the dot product of the force and the velocity integrated from t = 0 to t = 1 gives the identical result.

Surely i have to take into account the initial velocity into my final KE value? as the force will have accelerated the particle but it still had the initial velocity to add on?

which is why i added the original velocity to the new derived one?

just realized earlier on, i meant ADD the initial velocity to the new equation, rather than TAKE IT AWAY which i stated?

is it now correct?

KE final = (New integrated velocity + initial velocity) * m/2?

Iniital is just initial * m/2?
 
  • #11
Heisenburger said:
Surely i have to take into account the initial velocity into my final KE value? as the force will have accelerated the particle but it still had the initial velocity to add on?
No. Only the final velocity matters in the final kinetic energy.
which is why i added the original velocity to the new derived one?

just realized earlier on, i meant ADD the initial velocity to the new equation, rather than TAKE IT AWAY which i stated?

is it now correct?

KE final = (New integrated velocity + initial velocity) * m/2?
No. The final KE is the (final velocity)2m/2
 
  • #12
Yes Heisen, your thinking is correct.

Final KE is (integrated V + initial V)^2 *m/2, since the integrated v only accounts for speed gained due to force and doesn't consider initial v (so we add it in afterwards).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
977
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K