Hexapod Leg Design: Optimizing a 3D Printed Femur Assembly

  • Thread starter Thread starter theycallmevirgo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing the femur assembly of the Antdroid hexapod robot for 3D printing. The user seeks advice on whether to design the strut as a solid between the servo mounts or to conform to the plate arc for better structural integrity. They highlight the importance of torsional resistance and suggest that a closed rectangular cross-section could enhance performance while allowing for material savings through an empty core. The user has access to software for stress analysis and plans to share results for further insights. Overall, the goal is to create a more efficient and effective design for the leg assembly.
theycallmevirgo
Messages
108
Reaction score
25
The below is a leg assembly from the Antdroid open source hexapod robot (https://github.com/antdroid-hexapod/antdroid). The "femur" assembly connects the servos at S1 and S2. It is comprised of two side plates connected by cylindrical struts.

Being fundamentally lazy, I prefer to redesign this to be 3d printed as one unit. Obviously, the most likely way to cause destructive deformation is to rotate one end about central axis A_1 while holding the other end fixed. Strain along coplanar vertical axis is not in my opinion worth considering.

The question is, simply, how should I approach the design of the strut? Should I create a solid on a plane between the servo mounts, or should I create a solid that conforms to the plate arc? Either way, can I safely semove some part of the solid to save material? If so, at the center or at the edges?

If my explanations are unclear I will post images of alternatives later.

I have access to some decent software to study the stress reactions. I'm asking here so I can understand which results are "reasonable". Of course I will post outputs here.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.GIF
    Capture.GIF
    142.1 KB · Views: 179
Engineering news on Phys.org
You could copy the fundamental C shape of cast members of car's suspension struts.
Please, do a search for "cast strut arm"

If the printer could do it, a closed rectangular cross section would give the most torsional resistance about axis A1.
The core of that rectangle can be empty, as that material does not contribute to much resistance, saving some weight.
 
My idea is that I want to use immerse Whitetail Antlers in a fishtank to measure their volumetric displacement (the Boone and Crockett system is the current record measurement standard to place in a juxtaposition with) I would use some sight glass plumbed into the side of the tank to get the change in height so that I can multiply by the tank cross-section. Simple Idea. But... Is there a simple mechanical way to amplify the height in the sight glass to increase measurement precision...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
37K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K