Hi colleages. is Bernoulli-Euler theory valid in the dynamic analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of the Bernoulli-Euler theory in dynamic analysis, specifically the equation M/EI=1/R, where M represents moment, EI denotes stiffness, and R signifies curvature. Participants confirm that the equation can be valid when M is a function of both position (x) and time (t), provided that curvature (R) is also expressed in relation to these variables. It is established that if the curvature response to the moment is instantaneous, the equation reflects a static condition; however, real-world dynamics introduce time delays that complicate the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bernoulli-Euler beam theory
  • Familiarity with dynamic analysis concepts
  • Knowledge of moment-curvature relationships in structural engineering
  • Basic principles of elasticity and stiffness (EI)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of time-dependent loading on beam deflection
  • Explore advanced topics in dynamic analysis of structures
  • Study the effects of inertia and damping in beam dynamics
  • Learn about numerical methods for solving dynamic beam equations
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, researchers in mechanics, and students studying dynamic analysis of beams will benefit from this discussion.

omarxx84
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
hi colleages. is Bernoulli-Euler theory valid in the dynamic analysis as following:
M/EI=1/R
where,
M= moment
EI=stiffness
R= curvature
is this equation valid when M becomes a function of x and t, as follows:
M(x,t)/EI=1/R
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Dynamics and I never really got along that well, but what you present looks a lot like a beam equation, the deflection (curvature) of a beam as a function of the local bending moment (M), material stiffness (E) and geometry (I), and that is simple enough for me to take a stab at this.

So you are asking if the equation is valid where M varies not just along the length of the beam (x) but while M varies with time (t), is that right?

First, I would say that the curvature must also be expressed as a function of x and t.

Now, if the curvature response (R) to the input M is instantaneous, the answer would be yes, and rather than a dynamics problem, you have an equation expressing the static condition at any given moment in time. A series of static moments as it were.

But I think you are correct to characterize this as a dynamics problem. In the real world I have to think there is a time delay between applying the forces that give rise to the moment and the response of the beam.

At this point in the analysis my head explodes. You will have to take it from there, FWIW.

hth
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
492
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K