MHB High school inequality |2−(−1)n−l|≥a

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the existence of a positive constant \( a \) such that for any natural number \( k \), there exists an integer \( n \) greater than or equal to \( k \) satisfying the inequality \( |2 - (-1)^n - l| \geq a \). Participants clarify that for any integer \( n \), the expression \( (-1)^n \) results in either 1 or -1, leading to two cases for the absolute value: \( |1 - l| \) or \( |3 - l| \). The consensus is that both odd and even integers exist beyond any given \( k \), supporting the claim. The discussion emphasizes the need for a clearer understanding of the inequality's implications. Overall, the mathematical premise is deemed valid with proper interpretation.
solakis1
Messages
407
Reaction score
0
Given any real No $$l$$,then prove,that there exist $$a>0$$ such that ,for all natural Nos $$k$$ there exist $$n\geq k$$
such that:

$$|2-(-1)^n-l|\geq a$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Frankly, that doesn't make much sense. For any integer, n, (-1)^n is either 1 (n even) or -1 (n odd). So |2- (-1)^n- l| is either |2- 1- l|= |1- l| or |2+ 1- l|= |3- l|. Of course there exist both odd and even numbers larger than any given k.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Frankly, that doesn't make much sense. For any integer, n, (-1)^n is either 1 (n even) or -1 (n odd). So |2- (-1)^n- l| is either |2- 1- l|= |1- l| or |2+ 1- l|= |3- l|. Of course there exist both odd and even numbers larger than any given k.

Given any $$l$$ the OP is looking for $$a>0$$,such that:

$$\forall k(k\in N\Longrightarrow\exists n(n\geq k\wedge |2-(-1)^n-l|\geq a))$$

Does it make sense now ??
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
569
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K