B Higher Dimensional Vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,551
Reaction score
2,926
The 26 dimensional space of bosonic string theory could be denoted with alphabetical vectors.
[a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,x,y,z,].

The 196,883 dimensions of the monster group could be represented with all possible sequences of the first 21 letters plus all possible sequences of the last seven letters, plus one more symbol, presumably "a".

So [a, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaab, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaac ... vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv, ttttttt, ttttttu, .... zzzzzzz ]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't it better to simply use subscripts for these types of vectors?
 
A bit of a pedantic comment, but 196 883 is not the dimension of the group. It is the dimension of the minimal faithful representation (over the complex numbers).
 
What's the point of this thread?
 
What's the point of anything?
 
Thread 'How to define vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
21K
Replies
13
Views
10K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K