High School Higher Dimensional Vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion explores the representation of higher dimensional spaces in theoretical physics and mathematics, specifically focusing on bosonic string theory's 26-dimensional space and the 196,883 dimensions of the monster group. It suggests that using alphabetical vectors for these dimensions may be less effective than employing subscripts for clarity. Additionally, it clarifies that 196,883 refers to the dimension of the minimal faithful representation of the monster group, not the group itself. The conversation touches on the relationship between group symmetries and geometric shapes in various dimensions. Overall, the thread raises questions about the effectiveness of different notation systems in conveying complex mathematical concepts.
Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,594
Reaction score
2,962
The 26 dimensional space of bosonic string theory could be denoted with alphabetical vectors.
[a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,x,y,z,].

The 196,883 dimensions of the monster group could be represented with all possible sequences of the first 21 letters plus all possible sequences of the last seven letters, plus one more symbol, presumably "a".

So [a, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaab, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaac ... vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv, ttttttt, ttttttu, .... zzzzzzz ]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't it better to simply use subscripts for these types of vectors?
 
A bit of a pedantic comment, but 196 883 is not the dimension of the group. It is the dimension of the minimal faithful representation (over the complex numbers).
 
What's the point of this thread?
 
What's the point of anything?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
21K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K