Higher Dimensional Vectors

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the representation of higher-dimensional vectors in mathematical contexts, specifically within bosonic string theory and the monster group. It highlights the 26-dimensional space of bosonic string theory and the 196,883 dimensions of the monster group's minimal faithful representation. The conversation critiques the use of alphabetical vectors for these representations, suggesting that subscripts may provide a clearer notation. Additionally, it clarifies that the dimension of the monster group refers to its minimal faithful representation, not the group itself.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bosonic string theory and its dimensionality
  • Familiarity with the monster group and its mathematical properties
  • Knowledge of vector representation and notation in mathematics
  • Basic concepts of group theory and symmetry in higher dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of dimensionality in bosonic string theory
  • Explore the mathematical properties of the monster group and its representations
  • Learn about vector notation and subscripting in mathematical contexts
  • Investigate the relationship between group theory and geometric representations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, theoretical physicists, and students studying advanced topics in string theory and group theory will benefit from this discussion.

Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,757
Reaction score
3,032
The 26 dimensional space of bosonic string theory could be denoted with alphabetical vectors.
[a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,x,y,z,].

The 196,883 dimensions of the monster group could be represented with all possible sequences of the first 21 letters plus all possible sequences of the last seven letters, plus one more symbol, presumably "a".

So [a, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaab, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaac ... vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv, ttttttt, ttttttu, .... zzzzzzz ]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't it better to simply use subscripts for these types of vectors?
 
  • Agree
Likes   Reactions: Mark44
A bit of a pedantic comment, but 196 883 is not the dimension of the group. It is the dimension of the minimal faithful representation (over the complex numbers).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mathwonk
What's the point of this thread?
 
What's the point of anything?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
22K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K