Highest common factor question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike012
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the effectiveness of the Euclidean algorithm for finding the highest common factor (HCF) of polynomials, specifically for the expressions 4x^3 - 3x^2 - 24x - 9 and 8x^3 - 2x^2 - 53x - 39. Participants agree that the Euclidean algorithm is a reliable method, particularly for higher degree polynomials, while factoring may be suitable for lower degrees. There is a mention of a previous discussion on the same problem, indicating it may have been addressed before. The conversation suggests that while older techniques can be useful, modern methods like the Euclidean algorithm are preferred for efficiency. Overall, the Euclidean algorithm is endorsed as a solid approach for determining the HCF of polynomials.
Mike012
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was reading an older book on how to find the HCF and I wanted to know if it is a good technique or just a waste of time?

Find the highest common factor of 4x^3 - 3x^2 - 24x - 9 and 8x^3 - 2x^2 - 53x - 39

Is anyone familiar with the method? Are there better methods out there?

Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • HCF.jpg
    HCF.jpg
    12.4 KB · Views: 513
Physics news on Phys.org
This looks like the Euclidean algorithm (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greatest_common_divisor_of_two_polynomials). If so, yes it's a very good way to find the highest common factor (also known as the greatest common divisor). If the polynomials are of small enough degree, you could alternatively try to factor them and then compare their factorizations. But I think the Euclidean algorithm is better for higher degree polynomials.
 
Closed as a duplicate of the other question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K