Holder-Continuous Functions for a>1

  • Thread starter Thread starter calculus-stud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
Click For Summary
Holder continuity for a > 1 implies that the function must be constant, as the growth condition indicates that f(x) - f(y) is significantly smaller than y - x when y - x is small. This leads to the conclusion that the derivative f' must equal zero, as demonstrated using the definition of the derivative. The discussion emphasizes that the only interesting cases for Holder continuity occur when 0 < a ≤ 1, with a = 1 corresponding to Lipschitz continuity, which has significant implications in differential equations. The transition from h to y - x in the limit does not alter the outcome, as both approaches measure the distance between points. Overall, the analysis confirms that for a > 1, the function is constant, limiting the relevance of Holder continuity in this range.
calculus-stud
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm new to analysis, so I'm still trying to grapple with the concepts... there is one that has been bugging me forever now ---

||f(x) - f(y)|| <= ||x -y||a is the Holder-continuous equality. What happens if a becomes > 1, does that still remain Holder-continuous or is Holder-continuity valid only for 0<a<1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If a > 1 f should be constant. Try to prove f' = 0 using the definition of the derivative. Intuitively the growth condition on f(x) - f(y) (for a > 1) implies that f(x) - f(y) is much smaller than y-x when y-x is small.

So you still call it Holder continuity, but the name doesn't mean much. If a > 1 you have a constant function so there is not much to say. Thus the only interesting cases are for a less than or equal to 1. If a = 1, you have lipschitz continuity which has many consequences in say differential equations.
 
So, using the definition of derivative ---
f'(x) = lim h->0 f (x+h) - f(x)/h, if we have h = y-x then as you said from the growth condition, then the numerator which is f(y) - f(x) is much smaller than the denominator y-x, so f' = 0 for y-x close to 0. Is that right?

Also, when I'm changing h to y-x, how will the limit change?
 
Well you might want to show |f'| = 0 since then you will have absolute values in both the numerator and denominator of the difference quotient.

But you just repeated what I said instead of giving a proof, which is what you're expected to do in analysis. So try to show |f'| = 0 using the definition. It's really just one step, since all you can do is apply the given inequality.

Intuitively, replacing h with y-x shouldn't make a difference. If we fix x and let y approach x, h is of course just measuring how far y is from x; letting h approach 0 is the same as letting y move closer and closer to x. The formal way of demonstrating this is via the epsilon-delta definition of the limit. It's completely analogous to showing that continuity of some function g at a point b means g(x) -> g(b) as x -> b or equivalently g(b + h) -> g(b) as h -> 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K