Is There a Boundary Point Where the Holomorphic Function Equals Zero?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JYM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disc Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of holomorphic functions within a ball in C^n, specifically addressing the scenario where a holomorphic function f, continuous on the closure of the ball B(0,R), equals zero at some point a within B. It is established that if f is non-zero on the boundary of B, a contradiction arises, leading to the conclusion that there must exist a point p on the boundary where f(p)=0. This conclusion relies on the identity principle for holomorphic functions and the theorem regarding removable singularities from Gunning and Rossi's "Analytic Functions of Several Complex Variables".

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of holomorphic functions in complex analysis
  • Familiarity with the identity principle for holomorphic functions
  • Knowledge of removable singularities as discussed in Gunning and Rossi's text
  • Basic concepts of topology in C^n
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the identity principle for holomorphic functions in detail
  • Review the section on removable singularities in Gunning and Rossi's "Analytic Functions of Several Complex Variables"
  • Explore examples of holomorphic functions and their behavior on boundaries
  • Investigate the implications of the maximum modulus principle in complex analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in complex analysis, graduate students studying holomorphic functions, and researchers exploring the properties of analytic functions in several complex variables.

JYM
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I want to solve the following problem:
Suppose B=B(0,R) be a ball in C^n, n>1. Let f be holomorphic in B and continuous on B closure. If f(a)=0 for some a in B, show that there is p in boundary of B such that f(p)=0.
I assumed f(p) is non zero for every point p in boundary B and create contradiction but I can't. Please give me some hints.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a function that is holomorphic in an open neighborhood of a sphere (boundary of a ball) in C^n, n > 1, extends to be holomorphic in the interior of that ball. in your case, if the function is never zero on the boundary, then its reciprocal is holomorphic in an open neighborhood of the boundary of a slightly smaller ball, hence also in the interior of that smaller ball. now try to get a contradiction. this uses a theorem in chapter 1 of gunning and rossi, analytic functions of several complex variables, p.20, the section I.C on removable singularities. of course you also need the identity (uniqueness) principle for holomorphic functions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
Ok, Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K