Surely sets with the same cardinality are homeomorphic if we assign both of them the discrete topology. What's preventing us from doing that?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

For example, (0,1) and (2,3) \cup (4,5) have the same cardinality. With the natural subspace topology they are not homeomorphic - as one is connected and the other isn't. However I could say that they are homeomorphic by assigning the discrete topology on both. Why can't we do that? Is it because that we would lose our intuition of 'continuous deformation' if we did this?

This may sound stupid but I can't seem to get my head around this.

Thanks.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Homeomorphisms with the discrete topology

Loading...

Similar Threads for Homeomorphisms discrete topology | Date |
---|---|

I Homeomorphisms and ##\mathbb{R}## | Feb 22, 2018 |

I S^2 - {N} and R^2 homeomorphic? | Oct 6, 2017 |

I Why is this line not homeomorphic to the unit circle? | Sep 13, 2017 |

I Proving non homeomorphism between a closed interval & ##\mathbb{R}## | Jul 10, 2017 |

A Finding the bounds of a ratio | Aug 30, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**