Homogeneous function of degree n

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the proof of a homogeneous function of degree n, specifically focusing on the term t^(n-1) and its disappearance in the proof. Participants express confusion about the derivation and its connection to Euler's identity, emphasizing its importance in understanding transcendental functions. The conversation also touches on the relationship between propulsion systems and circular motion, highlighting the stability of structures like wheels. A clarification is provided that the result holds for all t in the real numbers, particularly for t = 1, confirming the proof's validity. Understanding this proof is deemed essential for grasping fundamental concepts in mathematical physics.
clairaut
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
I can't see the proof clearly.

Gradient [f(tx,ty)] dot
<d/dt (tx) , d/dt (ty)> =
d/dt [f(tx,ty)] = n * t^(n-1) * [f(x,y)]

I don't see how the t^(n-1) term disappears.

HELP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Help me!
 
Echo!
 
This proof is fundamental to our understanding of transcendental functions.

This proof is intimately connected to Euler's identity in that mass raised to the power of a rational number should equal e raised to the velocity function as fxn of mass.

Propulsion can also be designed in a cyclic process that is as stable as the circular motion that contains the constant centripetal acceleration.

Also, the circular wheel contains innate structural stability due to the forces pushing inward toward the center that causes tangential velocity.

Euler's number is so integral to the formation of a circle that there is an operator that brings out the power placed on the base as a multiple of the original function. This operator is known as the natural logarithm.

This proof must be understood
well!

Can somebody continue on with this incredible proof?

Prove inside this physics forum who is the real master of mathematical physics.
 
clairaut said:
I can't see the proof clearly.

Gradient [f(tx,ty)] dot
<d/dt (tx) , d/dt (ty)> =
d/dt [f(tx,ty)] = n * t^(n-1) * [f(x,y)]

I don't see how the t^(n-1) term disappears.

HELP

The result is true for all t \in \mathbb{R}, so in particular it is true for t = 1. Hence <br /> \mathbf{x} \cdot \nabla f = n 1^{n-1} f(\mathbf{x}) = n f(\mathbf{x}) as required.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
841
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
352
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K