Homogeneous System: Why Invertible A Has No Non-Zero Solutions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that for a homogeneous system represented by Ax = 0 to have non-zero solutions, the coefficient matrix A must be singular. If A is invertible, it implies that A-1 exists, leading to the conclusion that the only solution is the trivial solution x = 0. The one-to-one nature of invertible matrices ensures that no additional solutions exist, confirming the relationship between invertibility and the uniqueness of solutions in linear algebra.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically homogeneous systems.
  • Knowledge of matrix properties, particularly singular and invertible matrices.
  • Familiarity with the implications of matrix operations, such as A-1.
  • Basic grasp of one-to-one functions in the context of linear transformations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of singular and invertible matrices in linear algebra.
  • Learn about the implications of the Rank-Nullity Theorem on solutions of linear systems.
  • Explore the concept of linear transformations and their one-to-one characteristics.
  • Investigate applications of homogeneous systems in various fields such as engineering and computer science.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as educators seeking to explain the properties of homogeneous systems and matrix theory.

cupu
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

In a book I'm reading about linear algebra it's mentioned that in order for the homogeneous system
Ax = 0
to have a solution (other than the trivial solution) the coefficient Matrix must be singular.
The thing is, I can't remember (the wikipedia page on homogeneous systems didn't turn up anything) why if A is invertible, then the system does not have non-zero solutions.

Any help on why this is so is appreciated.

Thank you in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If A is invertible, then A-1 exists.
Ax = 0 ==> A-1Ax = A-10 = 0 ==> x = 0

Another way to look at it is that, for A-1 to exist, both it and A must be one-to-one. The equation Ax = 0 obviously has at least one solution, x = 0, but the one-to-oneness prevents it from having any additional solutions.
 
That makes sense, thank you very much for the response Mark44.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K