Horsepower based on distance and speed

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Cadbury204
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Horsepower Speed
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating horsepower based on distance, weight, and speed. Steven inquires about the horsepower required to move an object weighing 1582 kg over 180 meters at a speed of 93 KPH. The calculations provided by forum members utilize physics equations, including force (F=ma) and work done (Work = Force x Distance), leading to two different horsepower estimates: approximately 67.73 hp and 50.6 hp, depending on the assumptions made regarding acceleration and initial speed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as force, work, and power.
  • Familiarity with the equations of motion, specifically v^2 = u^2 + 2as.
  • Knowledge of horsepower conversion, specifically 1 horsepower = 745.7 watts.
  • Experience with basic algebra and rearranging equations for problem-solving.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of kinetic energy and its relation to horsepower calculations.
  • Learn about the various methods for estimating horsepower, including drag race calculators.
  • Explore the impact of friction and other forces on power requirements in real-world scenarios.
  • Investigate advanced topics in dynamics, such as variable acceleration and its effect on power output.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, automotive enthusiasts, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding the calculations behind horsepower and vehicle performance metrics.

Cadbury204
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was wondering if you can calculate horsepower given this information:
Distance traveled: 180 Meters
Weight of object: 1582 KG
Speed at the 180 meters: 93 KPH


Thanks,

Steven
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can calculate the power required to maintain that speed only with some assumptions, since power = energy/time. Equivalent to what Russ_watters said, you have to assume the only energy is kinetic (level ground, the power required to maintain constant speed works against frictional losses, etc)
 
Define:

a = acceleration
v = velocity
x = distance
c = constant
f = force
m = mass
p = power

Assuming constant power, lossless continuously variable transmission:

a = c / v
f = m a = m c / v
p = f v = (m c / v) v = m c

a = dv/dt = c/v
v dv = c dt
1/2 v2 = c t
v = (2 c)1/2 t1/2

a = c / ((2 c)1/2 t1/2)
v = (2 c)1/2 t1/2
x = 2/3 (2 c)1/2 t3/2

x = 180 m
v = 93 kph = 25.833333 m / s

using equation for v:
25.833333 = (2 c)1/2 t1/2
t = (25.833333)2 / (2 c)
t = 333.68055 / c

using equation for x
180 = 2/3 (2 c)1/2 (333.68055 / c)3/2
180 = 2/3 (2)1/2 (333.68055)3/2 (c / c3)1/2
180 = 2/3 (2)1/2 (333.68055)3/2 / c
c = 2/3 (2)1/2 (333.68055)3/2 / 180
c = 31.926226

p = m c = 1582 * 31.926226 = 50507.29 watts = 67.7314 hp

check

t = 333.68055 / c = 10.451613

v = (2 c)1/2 t1/2
v = (2 * 31.926226)1/2 10.4516131/2
v = 25.833333

x = 2/3 (2 c)1/2 t3/2
x = 2/3 (2 * 31.926226)1/2 10.4516133/2
x = 180.00000

I've never encountered this type of problem before, so it was a discovery process for me, perhaps someone could check my math?
 
Last edited:
I had a blast at this and would like to post my working, even if just for somebody to tell me why it's incorrect,

Use the equation of motion v^2 = u^2 + 2as and rearrange for a. Assume initial speed is 0, s=180m and v=25.8m/s

This gives an acceleration of 1.849m/s^2

Now F=ma with m=1582kg gives a force of 2925N

Work done = force x distance = 2925 x 180 = 526500J

Power = Work done/time = 526500/13.95 = 37742W (Time here is calculated using v = u +at)

Since 1 horsepower = 745.7 watts

Power = 37742/745.7 = 50.6 Horsepower.

The only incorrect assumption I can see is that you're not starting from rest, but I think the question suggests this.
 
dave_baksh said:
v = u +at
This formula assumes constant acceleration and constant force, so the power is increasing linearly with speed. My assumption was that the original post was asking for the constant power required to accelerate to speed for a given distance, similar to an estimate of power given time to distance or speed achieve in a distance, in a drag race for a given weight vehicle. The constant power is also the minimum power. Constant acceleration requires double the power at the end of the run, or force x speed => 101.2 horse power.
 
Last edited:
Well as long as we're all being creative here, I assumed a person carrying the object and approximated the motion of the object as a sine wave as he jogged along, then calculated the work done against gravity in every cycle and then used the frequency to find out how many cycles there were in 180m.
 
Pythagorean said:
Well as long as we're all being creative here
Not that creative on my part, do a web search for "horsepower estimator" and you'll find a lot of hits that based on 1/4 mile speed or time and weight, which is the approach I took, determine power given speed and distance from a standing start and weight of vehicle, although I simplified this assuming unlimited traction, and constant power. Examples of power estimators:

http://www.dragtimes.com/horsepower-et-trap-speed-calculator.php

http://www.dsm.org/tools/calchp.htm
 
Jeff Reid said:
Not that creative on my part, do a web search for "horsepower estimator" and you'll find a lot of hits that based on 1/4 mile speed or time and weight, which is the approach I took, determine power given speed and distance from a standing start and weight of vehicle, although I simplified this assuming unlimited traction, and constant power. Examples of power estimators:

http://www.dragtimes.com/horsepower-et-trap-speed-calculator.php

http://www.dsm.org/tools/calchp.htm

Well, I didn't mean it as an insult!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
8K