# How a force carrier particle gets a message to its owner particle?

• VRT
In summary: At which point 1st e got its momentum changed?1st e got its momentum changed after the photon it threw will interact with the second electron.
VRT
Can somebody please give me a little more detailed explanation of a simple Feynman diagram? It's not clear to me why the owner particle experience any force?

Let's check out 2 electrons interacting by a virtual photon.
1) 1st e is moving along, throwing gazilions of virtual photons but nothing is happening yet to its momentum. Even when it throws the photon that eventually will reach 2nd e, nothing happening just yet, right?
2) A virtual photon of 1st e reaches the 2nd e and 2nd e got its momentum changed.

Q: At which point 1st e got its momentum changed? I see several scenarios - please tell me which one is the correct one.
a) at the moment when the photon is thrown by 1st e (despite this photon - like gazilions of other virtual photons thrown by this e - didn't interact with 2nd e yet, the 1st e somehow knows that it will, so, no point to loose time - that's QM for you!);
b) after the photon will interact with 2nd e, 1st e will somehow instantaneously know it happened and will turn away;
c) after the photon will return back to the 1st e;
d) this process doesn't affect 1st e; it's up to 2nd e to throw another photon and hit 1st e to change 1st e momentum. Then 2 photons are needed to push 2 e away from each other.

Thanks.

What do you mean with "owner particle"?
1) 1st e is moving along, throwing gazilions of virtual photons
That is not a useful model of particle interactions. The exchange of virtual particles is a symmetric process, and it is meaningless to ask about the physical reality of particles on timescales smaller than those processes.

mfb said:
What do you mean with "owner particle"?

"owner" is the one that throws the force carrier particle. In my example it's the 1st e. It's still matters which one of 2 e thrown this specific photon that appears on the diagram, right? The photon doesn't just exist, it's moving from one e to the other one, right?

mfb said:
That is not a useful model of particle interactions. The exchange of virtual particles is a symmetric process, and it is meaningless to ask about the physical reality of particles on timescales smaller than those processes.

My scenario d) is somewhat symmetric but requires 2 photons.

I was afraid of "it is meaningless to ask..." reply but I anticipated it... If "throwing gazilions of virtual photons" (as a quantum representation of EM field) is not useful approach then you have to say that 1st e knew upfront where the 2nd e was and thrown just 1 photon in its direction - that sounds less likely to me...

VRT said:
"owner" is the one that throws the force carrier particle. In my example it's the 1st e. It's still matters which one of 2 e thrown this specific photon that appears on the diagram, right? The photon doesn't just exist, it's moving from one e to the other one, right?
No, that is not a working model. The electrons don't "throw" virtual photons. The whole Feynman diagram is a single process, it is pointless to consider individual components as events.

I was afraid of "it is meaningless to ask..." reply but I anticipated it... If "throwing gazilions of virtual photons" (as a quantum representation of EM field) is not useful approach then you have to say that 1st e knew upfront where the 2nd e was and thrown just 1 photon in its direction - that sounds less likely to me...
The whole approach to describe virtual photons like that does not work. They are virtual and not real, they are just a tool to calculate a process in quantum field theory.

VRT said:
"owner" is the one that throws the force carrier particle. In my example it's the 1st e. It's still matters which one of 2 e thrown this specific photon that appears on the diagram, right? The photon doesn't just exist, it's moving from one e to the other one, right?
you should be careful with feynman diagrams.They are not drawn simply in the way you like.One of the subtleties is that if you consider two electrons interacting by exchange of virtual photon,then you should not say which one is emitting the photon and which one is absorbing it.There is no consideration of this,when you will consider the S-matrix way for writing this process,you already will have a time ordering which will take care of both cases in which first is emitting or the second one is emitting.It is taken care in a single feynman diagram.

Besides, virtual photons do carry momenta even if they turn out to be reabsorbed by the same electron. The question seems to imply the opposite when it says
throwing gazilions of virtual photons but nothing is happening yet to its momentum
something is happening to its momentum. the virtual photon's momentum is (temporarily) being subtracted from it. Momentum conservation applies to all vertexes of the diagram.

mfb said:
No, that is not a working model. The electrons don't "throw" virtual photons. The whole Feynman diagram is a single process, it is pointless to consider individual components as events.

One can more or less think of individual components as events, so long as one remembers that this is quantum mechanics and we are summing up over all the different ways/orderings in which these events can happen. And that the standard on-shell masses are the most resonant/probable, but are not otherwise required by intermediate states.

Look at it the opposite way: starting at fields.

Classical electromagnetic field includes freely propagating electromagnetic waves, and their emission and absorption. These DO possesses energy, momentum, angular momentum.

And they are observably quantized into photons.

Now, classic electromagnetic field ALSO includes evanescent waves. As well as electrostatic and magnetostatic fields.

And these are devoid of energy or momentum.

Yet exert appreciable forces and torques...

Evanescent waves and static fields are supposed to be represented by virtual photons.

What signs do they show of being quantized in the first place?

VRT said:
1st e is moving along, throwing gazilions of virtual photons but nothing is happening yet to its momentum. Even when it throws the photon that eventually will reach 2nd e, nothing happening just yet, right?
Right! But not really.
When an electron throws a virtual photon, it has a "virtual recoil". If the particle lives, so does its recoil. Don't get caught up in the notion that the electron has a definite location in space.

AFAIK, you can't apply Newtonian physics to particles in a Feynman diagram. Concepts like force are meaningless.

Khashishi said:
AFAIK, you can't apply Newtonian physics to particles in a Feynman diagram. Concepts like force are meaningless.
The systems center of gravity will not shift - but it can be significantly indefinite.

## 1. How does a force carrier particle communicate with its owner particle?

The force carrier particle communicates with its owner particle through the fundamental forces of nature, such as electromagnetism, strong and weak nuclear forces, and gravity. These forces are carried by specific particles known as force carrier particles, which transmit the force between particles.

## 2. What is the role of a force carrier particle in the interaction between particles?

The role of a force carrier particle is to transmit the force between particles. For example, in the case of electromagnetism, the photon is the force carrier particle that transmits the electromagnetic force between charged particles.

## 3. How does a force carrier particle travel between particles?

A force carrier particle travels between particles by constantly exchanging energy and momentum with the particles it interacts with. This exchange of energy allows the force carrier particle to propagate and transmit the force between particles.

## 4. What distinguishes a force carrier particle from other particles?

Force carrier particles have distinct properties that allow them to transmit forces between particles, such as zero mass, zero charge, and the ability to travel at the speed of light. They also have specific interactions and behaviors with other particles that make them unique.

## 5. Can force carrier particles exist independently, without an owner particle?

No, force carrier particles cannot exist independently. They require an owner particle to interact with in order to transmit the force. Without an owner particle, the force carrier particle has no purpose or function.

• Quantum Physics
Replies
29
Views
2K
• Quantum Physics
Replies
46
Views
2K
• Quantum Physics
Replies
16
Views
1K
• Quantum Physics
Replies
30
Views
2K
• High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
2K
• Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
1K
• Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
724
• Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
• Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
1K
• Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K