High School How a Lagrangian can represent a theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hugo_faurand
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Theory
Click For Summary
A Lagrangian represents a physical theory by encapsulating its symmetries and the equations of motion. It is closely tied to the behavior of particles, with each term in the Lagrangian corresponding to interactions depicted in Feynman diagrams. Symmetries such as relativistic invariance and gauge symmetry are integral to constructing the Lagrangian, often requiring advanced mathematical understanding. The discussion emphasizes the importance of the Lagrangian density in this representation. A solid grasp of classical mechanics and quantum mechanics is essential for deeper exploration of these concepts.
hugo_faurand
Messages
62
Reaction score
10
Hello everyone !

I recently read an article about Standard Model's Lagrangian. And it made me remember another article (that I read a long time ago) which said that a theory's Lagrangian "represent" the theory.

But How ?

Maybe I didn't get the sense of "represent".
Also I know that there is something called the Lagrangian density so maybe it refers to this.Thanks in advance.

Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The lagrangian is determined by the symmetries and the order of equations of motion you want. You could call this "representing".
 
haushofer said:
The lagrangian is determined by the symmetries and the order of equations of motion you want. You could call this "representing".
Could you develop what is equatuond of motion's symmetries ?
 
The Lagrangian is used in the path integral formulation of quantum field theory. Basically, there is a direct relation between terms in the Lagrangian and particle behavior. Google up Feynman diagrams.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feynman_diagramhttps://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feynman_diagram
Each term in the Lagrangian corresponds to something represented by a Feynman diagram, which represents something happening in the particle theory. Some of the symmetries are represented explicitly. Relativistic in-variance is built in by using the mu-nu 4-derivatives, and building things up out of fields that are relativistic vectors, tensors, etc. Gauge symmetry is built up from the symmetries of the gauge field, usually called A-sub-mu or some such.

To get into this more you will need a lot of math. You could start with learning the Hamiltonian-Lagrange formulation of classical mechanics. The intro to that was a 4 month course for me. After that you could step over to the Hamiltonian-Lagrange formulation of quantum mechanics, then of quantum field theory. That was another two 4-month classes for me.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K