How big and bright is the Sun seen from 120 AU?

  • Thread starter Thread starter beginner49
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sun The sun
AI Thread Summary
At a distance of 120 AU, the Sun appears very bright, with an approximate magnitude of -16.3, allowing visibility similar to reading a newspaper. However, it would be perceived as a virtual point source due to its angular size, which is about 15 arc seconds at that distance. The angular size decreases inversely with distance, making the Sun appear significantly smaller compared to its size at 1 AU. Voyager 1 continues to accelerate due to gravitational influences and momentum from its initial launch. Overall, the Sun remains a prominent feature even at such vast distances.
beginner49
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi all

Currently, Voyager 1 is about 120 AU from the Sun. I wonder how big (or small) and bright would the Sun be seen from aboard this spacecraft . What approximate magnitude?.

Thanks in advance.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
beginner49 said:
Hi all

Currently, Voyager 1 is about 120 AU from the Sun. I wonder how big (or small) and bright would the Sun be seen from aboard this spacecraft . What approximate magnitude?.

Thanks in advance.

Here, thanks to Caltech, is an artist's conception of the Sun from the vicinity of Sedna at 8 billion miles' (about 86 AU) distance:

sedna-art.jpg
 
It's still very bright, even at 120 au, at about magnitude -16.3 [the full moon from Earth is about -12.7. So you would easily be able to read a newspaper. It would, however, be a virtual point source at that distance.
 
BadBrain and Chronos

Thanks a lot for your replies. That of being able to read a newspaper is a very interesting detail.

thanks again.
 
On a related topic, I heard that voyager was still accelerating, why? What causes it to accelerate further?
 
The angular size θ of the Sun's disk is given by the formula:
<br /> \sin \left( \frac{\theta}{2} \right) = \frac{R_S}{d}<br />
where RS is the radius of the Sun, and d is the distance from it.

Because the distance is much larger than the Sun's radius, the sine is very small. Therefore, to a sufficient precision we may substitute:
<br /> \sin \left( \frac{\theta}{2} \right) \approx \frac{\theta}{2}<br />
provided that we measure the angle in radians. Nevertheless, we see that:
<br /> \theta \approx \frac{2 R_S}{d} \propto \frac{1}{d}<br />
the angular size is approximately inversely proportional to the distance. At 1 A.U. (the Earth), the angular size of the Sun is about 31' (arc minutes). Therefore, at 120 A.U. it is:
<br /> \theta = \frac{31 &#039;}{120} \times \frac{60 &#039;&#039;}{1 &#039;} = 15.5 &#039;&#039;<br />
that is about 15 arc seconds.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top