How Black Holes Work: The Onion Explains

AI Thread Summary
The Onion provides a humorous, step-by-step explanation of black holes, but some readers feel it falls short of their usual quality. The article creatively engages with complex scientific concepts, making them accessible to a general audience. However, there are mixed reactions, with some expressing disappointment in the execution. The discussion highlights the balance between entertainment and informative content in science writing. Overall, the piece aims to simplify the enigmatic nature of black holes while maintaining The Onion's signature comedic style.
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Meh. The Onion has done better work.
 
phinds said:
Meh. The Onion has done better work.

Forgive them. Their best writers snagged a pen on the spacetime fabric and were never seen again.
 

Thread 'How feasible is home radio astronomy?'

Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
View full post »

Thread 'Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos'

This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
View full post »

Thread 'Visible light Over Large Distances'

How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
View full post »

Similar threads

B How Can Black Holes Vary in Size if They Are Singularities?
Replies
20
Views
2K
B Confusion regarding black hole spin
Replies
40
Views
3K
B What is the actual shape of black holes?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Stargazing Merger of two black holes (video)
Replies
7
Views
3K
I Light curving around vortex simulating a black hole
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Does light bend around black holes?
Replies
49
Views
5K
I Can there be slowly-falling accretion disks in black holes?
Replies
11
Views
2K
B I Need Help on Understanding Some Basic Astrophysics / Sand Clock Universe
Replies
5
Views
2K
Stargazing Dark matter and its effect on the orbit of stars
Replies
13
Views
3K
I The initial density of an object and its compression into a black hole
Replies
17
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top