How can a basis in a vector space be used to determine linear independence?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A basis in a vector space is a subset of vectors that spans the space and is linearly independent. Linear independence means that no vector in the basis can be expressed as a linear combination of the others. For instance, if vectors u, v, and w form a basis in a three-dimensional space, they are linearly independent if there are no linear combinations of u and v that can yield w. This concept is crucial for understanding the structure of vector spaces and their dimensionality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with linear combinations and linear operators
  • Knowledge of the concept of linear independence
  • Basic grasp of dimensionality in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector spaces in linear algebra
  • Learn about linear transformations and their applications
  • Explore the concept of spanning sets and their significance
  • Investigate the relationship between bases and dimensions in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of vector spaces and linear independence.

Krovski
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
From what I understand, a basis is essentially a subset of a vector space over a given field.

Now what I'm not so sure of is the linearly independence part. If the basis has two linearly independent vectors, then than means they aren't collinear: rather, they wouldn't have the same slope or be generated by each other?

let's say a vector v\epsilonV is (v_{1}, v_{2},...,v_{n})
and a vector w\epsilonV is (w_{1}, w_{2},...,w_{n})
such that
v \neq cw.
for any constant c\epsilon\textbf{F}

These would then be non-collinear which means there are no linear operators that can turn v into w?

Any insight would be greatly appreciated and thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Krovski! :smile:
Krovski said:
These would then be non-collinear which means there are no linear operators that can turn v into w?

Yes.

Similarly, 3 vectors u v and w are linearly independent if there are no linear operators that can turn u and v into w, ie au + bv = w (and similarly for any number of vectors).
 
Actually, there are no *linear combinations* of u and v that can give you w. But you can still have a linear operator that could possibly take u to v.

For example, suppose
{ u , v , w } is a basis ( for a 3 dimensional space, and they are all linearly independent ) then permuting this basis to { v , u , w } and extending by linearity is a linear operator
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K