How Can a Farmer Minimize the Cost of Fencing a Rectangular Field?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on optimizing the cost of fencing a rectangular field of 1.5 million square feet. The total length of the fence is expressed as L(x) = 3x + 2y, where y is derived from the area constraint A = xy. By substituting y and differentiating, the minimum length of the fence is found at x = 1000 ft and y = 1500 ft. The optimization method discussed includes using calculus and derivative tests to confirm the minimum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optimization problems in calculus
  • Familiarity with differentiation and critical points
  • Knowledge of area and perimeter formulas for rectangles
  • Basic understanding of Lagrange multipliers for constrained optimization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study optimization techniques using Lagrange multipliers
  • Learn about derivative tests for identifying minima and maxima
  • Explore real-world applications of optimization in agriculture
  • Investigate other geometric optimization problems, such as minimizing material costs for different shapes
USEFUL FOR

Farmers, agricultural engineers, mathematicians, and anyone interested in optimization techniques for resource management and cost reduction in agricultural practices.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
this is an optimization problem

A farmer wants to fence an area of $1.5$ million square feet
$(1.5\text{ x }10^6 \text{ ft}^2)$
in an a rectangular field and then divide it in half with a fence parallel to one of the sides of the rectangle. How can he do this so as to minimize the cost of the fence?

well, I understand the problem to mean that the fence goes around the perimeter then another fence goes down the middle dividing the area in half. So using the length $l$ as $2$ sides and another fence $l$ length going down the middle then.

total length of fence $\displaystyle f(l) = 3l+\frac{2\cdot 1.5\text{ x }10^6}{l}$

persuming this is correct then $\frac{d}{dl}f(l)=0$ would be $l$ for the min length of fence for that area
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would let $0<x$ represent the 3 lengths of fence and $0<y$ represent the two lengths perpendicular to the first 3. And so the total length $L$ of fence is:

$$L(x,y)=3x+2y$$

This is our objective function, i.e., that which we wish to optimize.

Now, we are constrained by the fixed area $0<A$ to be enclosed, and since the area is rectangular, we may write:

$$A=xy$$

Solving the constraint for $y$, we obtain:

$$y=\frac{A}{x}$$

Hence, we may write the length function in terms of one variable:

$$L(x)=3x+\frac{2A}{x}$$

This is equivalent to what you have. Now, when optimizing, you do want to differentiate with respect to the independent variable and equate the result to zero, and I would also use one of the derivative tests to demonstrate that the critical value found is indeed at a minimum.

Note: I use $A$ simply so that the large number can be plugged in at the end, after the calculations are done, instead of writing it numerous times. In your third semester of calculus, you will be taught a method for problems like this that is computationally much simpler, called Lagrange multipliers. :D
 
I changed this to avoid 2 variables

$L(x) = 3x-3\cdot 10^6\cdot x^{-1}$

so $\displaystyle\frac{d}{dx}L(x)$ is $\displaystyle 3-\frac{3\cdot 10^6}{x^2}$

then $3x^2-3\cdot 10^6=0$ so $x=1000\text { ft}$

and $\displaystyle\frac{1.5\cdot 10^6}{1000}=1500\text{ ft}$
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K