How can a physicist be a christian at the same time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeebs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicist Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the compatibility of being a physicist and a Christian, highlighting that the perceived conflict between science and religion is largely imaginary. Participants argue that individuals can separate their scientific reasoning from their religious beliefs, often using religion for moral guidance rather than literal interpretation of texts. Many suggest that upbringing and the need for community or belief can influence a person's adherence to religion despite scientific understanding. The conversation also references historical figures like Galileo and Newton, illustrating how interpretations of faith and science can coexist or adapt over time. Ultimately, it concludes that maintaining distinct boundaries between scientific inquiry and religious faith can allow for both to coexist without conflict.
  • #51
Religion doesn't explain how it explains the ultimate why which is something that no one knows science alone can answer. Those that say religion explains how to everything are putting words in G-d's mouth most of the time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
I never said it did. The reason math has no basis in real life is because the universe has no axioms mathematicians can use to build theories around.
 
  • #53
xdrgnh said:
Religion doesn't explain how it explains the ultimate why which is something that no one knows science alone can answer. Those that say religion explains how to everything are putting words in G-d's mouth most of the time.

What about issues that religion explains that disagrees with science? Like how the Earth was formed, when it happened, how life was created. These are DIRECTLY dealt with in every religious text I've looked into.
 
  • #54
Religion doesn't. People putting words into G-d's mouth do. Religion interpretation which is in line with the bible takes care of how the Earth was formed and shows that our scientific understanding of how the Earth and universe was formed does not contradict that. Look in the bible does it explain how G-d created life? In order to understand the story of Genesis for what it is you need more then a literal reading of the bible. Only fundamentalists subscribe to the literal reading.
 
  • #55
xdrgnh said:
Religion doesn't. People putting words into G-d's mouth do. Religion interpretation which is in line with the bible takes care of how the Earth was formed and shows that our scientific understanding of how the Earth and universe was formed does not contradict that. Look in the bible does it explain how G-d created life? In order to understand the story of Genesis for what it is you need more then a literal reading of the bible. Only fundamentalists subscribe to the literal reading.

No no no, you cannot claim this. This is YOUR opinion. MANY MANY other people have a different view. THAT is the issue. There are many people who aren't fundamentalist that believe the Earth was created a short time ago and in a very short amount of time.
 
  • #56
No it's the orthodox approach. Maimonides a famous Jewish theologian said that if science conflicts the Torah then either science is wrong or we are misreading the Torah. Because we can virtually rule out science being wrong this is where religion interpretation comes in. Something that fundamentalism lacks. If people still have a problem with science then either they don't understand science or they just want to put words in G-d's mouth to feel better about themselves. It's not the religion.
 
Last edited:
  • #57
xdrgnh said:
No it's the orthodox approach. Maimonides a famous Jewish theologian said that if science conflicts the Torah then either science is wrong or we are misreading the Torah. Because we can virtually rule out science being wrong this is where religion interpretation comes in. Something that fundamentalism lacks. If people still have a problem with science then either they don't understand science or they just want to put words in G-d's mouth to feel better about themselves. It's not the religion.

Again this is YOUR opinion and not a statement about religion as a whole. The issue is about religion as a whole, not one single interpretation or even a single religion.
 
  • #58
This discussion is circling the drain in the usual manner. Thread closed.
 
Back
Top