How can a vector field with circular components have a zero curl?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter superg33k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl Cylindrical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A vector field defined in cylindrical coordinates as \(\mathbf{E} = \frac{A}{r} \mathbf{ \hat{e}_{\phi} }\) can have a zero curl despite having circular components. The curl is calculated as \(\mathbf{curlE} = \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial}{\partial r} r \frac{A}{r} \mathbf{ \hat{e}_{z} } = \mathbf{0}\). However, the presence of a singularity at the origin invalidates the application of the theorem that would typically allow for a zero curl in this context. Therefore, the line integral around a circular path yields a non-zero result, specifically \(2 \pi A\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields in cylindrical coordinates
  • Knowledge of curl and line integrals in vector calculus
  • Familiarity with singularities in mathematical functions
  • Basic principles of vector calculus theorems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector fields in cylindrical coordinates
  • Learn about the implications of singularities in vector calculus
  • Explore the application of Stokes' Theorem in vector fields
  • Investigate examples of curl in various vector fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are studying vector calculus, particularly those interested in the behavior of vector fields and their properties.

superg33k
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
If a vector field has any component in a circular direction how can its curl be zero? If I imagine a vortex of water, it makes sense that it will be easier to go with the water in a circle than it would be to go against the water in a circle. Or more mathsy:

A vector field in cylindrical coords is defined by:
\mathbf{E} = \frac{A}{r} \mathbf{ \hat{e}_{\phi} }
where A is a constant. Therefore the curl is zero.
\mathbf{curlE} = \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial}{\partial r} r \frac{A}{r} \mathbf{ \hat{e}_{z} } = \mathbf{0}
So taking a line integral in a circle, taking it back to the same point should also be zero.
\int^{2 \pi}_{0} \mathbf{E \cdot} r \mathbf{\hat{e_{\phi}}} \partial \phi = \int^{2 \pi}_{0} \frac{A}{r} \mathbf{ \hat{e}_{\phi} } \mathbf{\cdot} r \mathbf{\hat{e_{\phi}}} \partial \phi =\int^{2 \pi}_{0} A \partial \phi = 2 \pi A \neq 0

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quite correctly calculated!

The reason is that your function E has a singularity in the region bounded by your curve (i.e, at the origin).

The theorem you had in mind specifically requires, in order to be valid, that such singularities do not exist, so you have misapplied it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
900
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K