Wave equation solution using Fourier Transform

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the massless Klein-Gordon field equation, represented as the wave equation \Box \ \phi = 0. The user initially struggles to derive the general solution, which is given by the integral involving Fourier transforms. After identifying a mistake in applying the reality condition, the correct condition is established as \hat{\phi}(-\mathbf{p},t)=\hat{\phi}^\ast(\mathbf{p},t). This leads to the correct formulation of the solution, combining integrals and utilizing the Minkowski inner product to arrive at the final expression for the field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory concepts
  • Familiarity with Fourier Transform techniques
  • Knowledge of the Klein-Gordon equation
  • Proficiency in applying reality conditions in field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Klein-Gordon equation from first principles
  • Learn about the application of Fourier Transforms in Quantum Field Theory
  • Explore the properties of the Minkowski inner product in field equations
  • Investigate the implications of reality conditions in quantum fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in Quantum Field Theory, physicists working with wave equations, and anyone interested in advanced mathematical physics concepts.

leo.
Messages
90
Reaction score
4
I'm studying Quantum Field Theory and the first example being given in the textbook is the massless Klein Gordon field whose equation is just the wave equation \Box \ \phi = 0. The only problem is that I'm not being able to get the same solution as the book. In the book the author states that the general solution is:

\phi(\mathbf{x},t)=\int \dfrac{d^3\mathbf{p}}{(2\pi)^3}(a_p e^{-i\omega_p t + i\mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{p}}+a_p^\ast e^{i\omega_p t - i\mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{p}})

Now to get this I expandand \Box \ \phi = (\partial_t^2 - \nabla^2)\phi and took the Fourier transform so that we get the equation (\partial_t^2 + \omega_p^2)\hat{\phi}(\mathbf{p},t)=0 where \omega_p = |p|.

This equation now has \mathbf{p} just as a parameter and we can easily solve it since it is just the simple harmonic oscilator equation of motion. We end up with

\hat{\phi}(\mathbf{p},t)= a_p e^{-i\omega_p t}+b_p e^{i\omega_p t}

If we now use the Fourier inversion formula we have that

\phi(\mathbf{x},t)=\int \dfrac{d^3\mathbf{p}}{(2\pi)^3}\hat{\phi}(\mathbf{p},t)e^{i\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{x}}=\int \dfrac{d^3\mathbf{p}}{(2\pi)^3}(a_p e^{-i\omega_p t}+b_p e^{i\omega_p t})e^{i\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{x}}.

This is almost the result, but we need, however, to ensure \phi is a real field. For that we need to apply the reality condition to the Fourier transform:

\hat{\phi}(\mathbf{p},-t)=\hat{\phi}^\ast(\mathbf{p},t)

This provides us with

a_p e^{i\omega_p t} + b_p e^{-i\omega_p t} = a_p^\ast e^{i\omega_p t} + b_p^\ast e^{-i\omega_p t}

Now I'm stuck here. I'm not getting how from this condition I can arrive naturally at the textbook answer. How can I proceed this to arrive at the same solution that the textbook presents?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you handle eipx correctly when you formed φ*(p,t) ?
 
Actually not. Sometime after posting this here, I realize that I made a huge mistake: I messed up the coordinates and applied the reality condition as if the Fourier transform was on the t rather than \mathbf{x} variable. This was the whole problem, so I think I'll post the correct solution. The correct reality condition is:

\hat{\phi}(-\mathbf{p},t)=\hat{\phi}^\ast(\mathbf{p},t)

which translates into

a_{-p}e^{-i\omega_p t}+b_{-p}e^{i\omega_p t}=a_{p}^\ast e^{i\omega_p t}+b_p^\ast e^{-i\omega_p t}

then using the linear indepence of the functions e^{-i\omega_p t} and e^{i\omega_p t} which can be derived from the Wronskian determinant, we derive that a_{-p}=b_p^\ast. Thus the expansion becomes:

\phi(\mathbf{x},t)=\int \dfrac{d^3 p}{(2\pi)^3}(a_p e^{-i\omega_p t}e^{i \mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{p}} + a_{-p}^\ast e^{i\omega_p t}e^{i\mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{p}})

Now this can be split into two integrals

\phi(\mathbf{x},t)=\int \dfrac{d^3 p}{(2\pi)^3}(a_p e^{-i\omega_p t}e^{i \mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{p}})+\int \dfrac{d^3 p}{(2\pi)^3}(a_{-p}^\ast e^{i\omega_p t}e^{i\mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{p}})

Finally on the second integral we perform the change of variables \mathbf{p}\mapsto -\mathbf{p}, and we get from the change of variables formula, recalling that \omega_p = |\mathbf{p}|=\omega_{-p} we get

\phi(\mathbf{x},t)=\int \dfrac{d^3 p}{(2\pi)^3}(a_p e^{-i\omega_p t}e^{i \mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{p}})+\int \dfrac{d^3 p}{(2\pi)^3}(a_{p}^\ast e^{i\omega_p t}e^{-i\mathbf{x}\cdot \mathbf{p}})

And finally we can combine the two integrals using the Minkowski inner product x^\mu p_\mu = \eta_{\mu\nu}x^\mu p^\nu with again x^\mu = (t,\mathbf{x})^\mu and p^\mu = (\omega_p, \mathbf{p})^\mu. This directly leads to the correct answer:

\phi(\mathbf{x},t)=\int \dfrac{d^3 p}{(2\pi)^3}(a_p e^{-i p_\mu x^\mu}+a_{p}^\ast e^{i p_\mu x^\mu})
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
978
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K