MHB How Can Algebraic Manipulation Prove the Consensus Property in Logic Circuits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shamieh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manipulation
shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
Some background: I am in EE 280 Design of Logic Circuits.

Problem: Use algebraic manipulation to prove that xy +yz +x!z = xy + x!z. (Note that this is the consensus property which is: xy + yz + x!z = xy + x!z)

+ mean OR, ! mean NOT.

Please help! I am lost. I do have the rules near me (x AND 1 = x etc.. as well as the "Single Variable Theorems") If someone could walk me through solving this that would be great and I would be forever thankful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try this:
$$xy+\bar{x}z+yz=xy+\bar{x}z+(x+\bar{x})yz.$$
 
Awesome, just figured it out. I solved and everything. I have a question tho. Where exactly does the rule (x + x!) come in play? I guess my question essentially is; how do I know that I can randomly put in a (x + x!) in the 2nd term. What is the property or rule that tells me I can do that legally? Sorry if this seems like a dumb question I'm just trying to understand what I'm actually doing versus just solving the equation.

Thanks again Ackbach,
-Sham(Ninja)
 
Well, $x+\bar{x}=\text{T}$, and $Tz=z$. So you can always multiply anything by $T$ and not change the truth value.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top