MHB How can AM-GM be used to solve the Inequality Challenge II?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the inequality involving the sum of cube roots and a series of fractions. A proposed approach involves manipulating the terms to facilitate comparison, specifically by rewriting parts of the inequality and applying the AM-GM inequality. The participants highlight that the left side can be expressed as a sum of differences, while the right side consists of a series of fractions. The AM-GM argument is recognized as a key method to establish the desired inequality, demonstrating that the left-hand terms are indeed less than the right-hand terms. The conversation concludes with acknowledgment of the effectiveness of this approach and the excitement for further solutions.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove that

$\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{2}{1}}+\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{3}{2}}+\cdots+\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{996}{995}}-\dfrac{1989}{2}<\dfrac{1}{3}+\dfrac{1}{6}+\cdots+ \dfrac{1}{8961}$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Prove that

$\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{2}{1}}+\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{3}{2}}+\cdots+\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{996}{995}}-\dfrac{1989}{2}<\dfrac{1}{3}+\dfrac{1}{6}+\cdots+ \dfrac{1}{8961}$
Not a solution, but a possible line of approach:
[sp]Start by noticing that $\dfrac{1989}2 = 995 - \dfrac12$, and $\dfrac1{8961} = \dfrac1{9\cdot995+6}.$ Next, notice that $\dfrac12 = \dfrac13+\dfrac16$. So we can subtract $\dfrac12$ from the left side, and $\dfrac13+\dfrac16$ from the right side, so that the inequality becomes $$\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{2}{1}} +\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{3}{2}} +\ldots +\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{996}{995}} - 995 < \frac19 + \frac1{12} + \frac1{15} + \ldots + \frac1{9\cdot995} + \frac1{9\cdot995+3} + \frac1{9\cdot995+6}.$$ If we write this as $$\sum_{n=1}^{995}\Bigl(\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{n+1}n} - 1\Bigr) < \sum_{n=1}^{995}\Bigl(\frac1{9n} + \frac1{9n+3} + \frac1{9n+6}\Bigr),$$ then it is tempting to think that each term on the left might be less than the corresponding term on the right, in other words $$\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{n+1}n} - 1 < \frac1{9n} + \frac1{9n+3} + \frac1{9n+6}\quad (\text{for all }n\geqslant 1).$$ I believe that is true. It certainly holds for $n=1$, because $\sqrt[3]{2} -1 \approx 0.2599$ and $\frac19 + \frac1{12} + \frac1{15} \approx 0.2611$. It also appears to hold for other values of $n$. But it is a delicate inequality – the difference between the two sides is extremely small – and I have not found any convenient way to prove it.[/sp]

Edit, Oh, it's suddenly obvious!
[sp]It's just an AM-GM argument: $$\begin{aligned} \sqrt[3]{\dfrac{n+1}n} &= \sqrt[3]{\dfrac{3n+1}{3n} \cdot \dfrac{3n+2}{3n+1} \cdot \dfrac{3n+3}{3n+2}} \\ &< \frac13\Bigl( \dfrac{3n+1}{3n} + \dfrac{3n+2}{3n+1} + \dfrac{3n+3}{3n+2} \Bigr) \\ &= \frac13\Bigl(1 + \frac1{3n} + 1 + \frac1{3n+1} + 1 + \frac1{3n+2} \Bigr) \\ &= 1 + \frac1{9n} + \frac1{9n+3} + \frac1{9n+6}. \end{aligned}$$ [/sp]
 
Last edited:
Opalg said:
Not a solution, but a possible line of approach:
[sp]Start by noticing that $\dfrac{1989}2 = 995 - \dfrac12$, and $\dfrac1{8961} = \dfrac1{9\cdot995+6}.$ Next, notice that $\dfrac12 = \dfrac13+\dfrac16$. So we can subtract $\dfrac12$ from the left side, and $\dfrac13+\dfrac16$ from the right side, so that the inequality becomes $$\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{2}{1}} +\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{3}{2}} +\ldots +\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{996}{995}} - 995 < \frac19 + \frac1{12} + \frac1{15} + \ldots + \frac1{9\cdot995} + \frac1{9\cdot995+3} + \frac1{9\cdot995+6}.$$ If we write this as $$\sum_{n=1}^{995}\Bigl(\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{n+1}n} - 1\Bigr) < \sum_{n=1}^{995}\Bigl(\frac1{9n} + \frac1{9n+3} + \frac1{9n+6}\Bigr),$$ then it is tempting to think that each term on the left might be less than the corresponding term on the right, in other words $$\sqrt[3]{\dfrac{n+1}n} - 1 < \frac1{9n} + \frac1{9n+3} + \frac1{9n+6}\quad (\text{for all }n\geqslant 1).$$ I believe that is true. It certainly holds for $n=1$, because $\sqrt[3]{2} -1 \approx 0.2599$ and $\frac19 + \frac1{12} + \frac1{15} \approx 0.2611$. It also appears to hold for other values of $n$. But it is a delicate inequality – the difference between the two sides is extremely small – and I have not found any convenient way to prove it.[/sp]

That is a good line with all excellent observations, Opalg!(Nerd)

Opalg said:
Edit, Oh, it's suddenly obvious!
[sp]It's just an AM-GM argument – details to follow tomorrow.[/sp]

I can't wait to read your solution...:o
 
anemone said:
I can't wait to read your solution...:o
Previous comment now edited to complete solution. (Emo)
 
Opalg said:
Edit, Oh, it's suddenly obvious!
[sp]It's just an AM-GM argument: $$\begin{aligned} \sqrt[3]{\dfrac{n+1}n} &= \sqrt[3]{\dfrac{3n+1}{3n} \cdot \dfrac{3n+2}{3n+1} \cdot \dfrac{3n+3}{3n+2}} \\ &< \frac13\Bigl( \dfrac{3n+1}{3n} + \dfrac{3n+2}{3n+1} + \dfrac{3n+3}{3n+2} \Bigr) \\ &= \frac13\Bigl(1 + \frac1{3n} + 1 + \frac1{3n+1} + 1 + \frac1{3n+2} \Bigr) \\ &= 1 + \frac1{9n} + \frac1{9n+3} + \frac1{9n+6}. \end{aligned}$$ [/sp]

Bravo, Opalg! The solution that I have is quite similar as yours and thus I won't reveal it and for your information, I am not the mastermind who provided that solution. :o
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top