I How can artificial gravity be created for space exploration?

Click For Summary
Creating artificial gravity for space exploration is considered essential for human colonization beyond Earth, primarily due to the challenges posed by zero gravity. The most feasible method discussed is using centripetal acceleration through rotation, which simulates gravity but requires careful design to manage forces on the human body. Concerns about the Coriolis effect and varying forces at different distances from the rotational axis are noted, but adaptability of the human body is emphasized. Alternatives like linear acceleration are deemed less practical due to fuel limitations and the need for external forces. Overall, while artificial gravity remains largely theoretical, it is a critical area of exploration for future space missions.
  • #31
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
The thread is now reopened...
 
  • #33
I think that pause has released us all from the thread's grip.
 
  • #34
kimbyd said:
So if you're throwing a ball "up" in a rotating spacecraft , it'd move in a weird arc.
Weird only insofar as the conditioning you’ve had in living in standard Earth gravity.

It wouldn’t be “weird” after a few weeks. The brain is amazingly plastic.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale and sophiecentaur
  • #35
sophiecentaur said:
Is it really worth introducing Sci-Fi ('Fiction') ideas into an Engineering problem? We might as well have a man with a magic wand on board to take us wherever we want.
And before quoting Arthur C Clarke, his ideas came from informed sources. The only real error in his fiction was the time scale for his events - very optimistic.
Our current state of technology is a series of realized ‘fiction.’
 
  • #36
Digcoal said:
Our current state of technology is a series of realized ‘fiction.’
If you made two lists of SciFi ideas, with the fruitful ones in one list and the dead ends in the other, I think the dead ends would be in a huge majority. But that isn't a criticism of SciFi literature; a random bit of SciFi will be about as 'valuable' as any other bit of fiction.

We're straying into the realms of semantics. But I would disagree with the idea that 'fiction' is necessarily the route to technological solutions. Very often, it's Maths and concentrated thought that yield to advances in technology. The process of invention is very varied and will depend on the individual. But so much technological advance these days is based on group discussion.
But if you want to define fiction appropriately then you can get any answer you want to this question.
 
  • #37
sophiecentaur said:
Very often, it's Maths and concentrated thought that yield to advances in technology.
And the cases where it is not are usually happy accidents followed by carefully digging into a “that was weird”. Such happy accidents are hard for sci-fi writers to predict.

Any way, let’s not divert to a discussion about sci-fi
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
22K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K