How can I analyze the effects of this orifice in a pressure regulator?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing the effects of an orifice in a gas pressure regulator, focusing on its role in pressure regulation and potential vacuum creation. Participants explore mathematical techniques and theoretical models relevant to understanding this feature, including the possibility of it functioning as a Venturi.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks basic mathematical techniques to model the effects of the orifice in the pressure regulator.
  • Another participant clarifies the orientation of the inlet and regulated side, noting that the orifice connects regulated pressure to the upper chamber and creates a vacuum.
  • A participant questions whether the orifice functions as a Venturi and asks for equations to prove or disprove this theory.
  • One participant points out the absence of the original engineers who designed the product, suggesting a lack of available design information.
  • Another participant mentions that the feature was designed through product testing, specifically using flow rigs.
  • A later reply shares a resource that may provide relevant information for the analysis.
  • One participant reflects on their initial dismissal of the Venturi theory, considering the flow dynamics involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the exact nature of the orifice's function, with some proposing it may act as a Venturi while others seek clarification and further evidence. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the definitive role of the orifice and the appropriate mathematical modeling techniques.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in available design information and the reliance on empirical testing rather than theoretical documentation. There is also uncertainty regarding the applicability of the Venturi principle to the orifice in question.

MrBear
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi folks,

Firstly a little background, I work for a company that manufactures gas pressure regulators. Last year I was a machinist studying for my HNC in manufacturing engineering. Since passing work has given me the opportunity to work in the product engineering office as a product tester and work load within the office has increased lately due to expansion, I have been tasked with analysing a certain feature of the new product range.

I need to model the effects of the below orifice (in red), but I have no idea what I'm doing!

Are there any basic math techniques I can use to get a better understanding of what is happening at this feature?

RSHN8-02-11-VVK-GN5 - Closer2.jpg


Thank you for your time.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Is the inlet on the left (supply side) and the regulated side on the right? If so, it looks like this orifice puts regulated pressure under the diaphragm.
 
Thanks for the reply Insightful, yes the inlet is to the right of the image. The orifice does indeed connect the regulated pressure to the upper chamber, what it also does is create a vacuum.

All my research is telling me that this is a Venturi, I'm not sure this is the case. Is there any way to prove/disprove this? What equations would I need?

Many thanks
 
Don't you have the engineers who designed it nearby?
 
I'm afraid not, they're all in Holland. The company I work for purchased the product range, little information regarding the design came with it.

I have been told that this feature was designed through product testing ie. flow rigs.
 
That's magic, thank you so much. Funnily enough I was looking at it with a pitot in mind. I always thought that the process media has to enter directly into the tube rather than flow over it, hence my dismissal of the theory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K