How can I apply the chain rule correctly to functions?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter scook116
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Chain rule
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the chain rule in calculus, specifically in the context of differentiating a function related to the motion of an airliner. Participants are exploring how to correctly apply differentiation techniques, including the chain rule and product rule, to derive expressions for velocity and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about applying the chain rule to a specific function and seeks assistance in identifying errors in their approach.
  • Another participant suggests assuming a relationship between variables, specifically that \( x = t \), to simplify differentiation.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of expressions resulting from differentiation, with one participant mentioning difficulties in choosing appropriate variables for differentiation.
  • Participants discuss the importance of recognizing common factors in expressions to simplify calculations before applying differentiation rules.
  • One participant shares a derived expression for the first derivative, agreeing with an earlier posted result, and encourages others to try deriving it themselves.
  • Another participant highlights the need for clarity in differentiating terms and suggests that separating sums before applying differentiation rules may simplify the process.
  • There is a mention of the emotional impact of struggling with calculus, with one participant sharing personal challenges related to focusing on details during problem-solving.
  • Participants discuss strategies for prioritizing operations in calculus, emphasizing the importance of recognizing when to combine like terms and the timing of applying differentiation rules.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to apply the chain rule and other differentiation techniques correctly, but there is no consensus on the best approach to take or the specific errors made in the original problem. Multiple viewpoints on how to simplify and differentiate the expressions remain present.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the complexity of the expressions and the potential for confusion when applying differentiation rules, indicating that the discussion may be limited by individual interpretations of the rules and the specific problem context.

scook116
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm randomly having trouble applying the chain rule to functions (well, 1 function in particular), I was hoping someone could quickly walk me through this simple problem as I don't know where I've gone wrong. I've tried U substitution, chain/product rule, factoring answer...but I just can't see it

I'm trying to get View attachment 2119 from View attachment 2118
 

Attachments

  • 7.png
    7.png
    1.3 KB · Views: 136
  • 7(1).png
    7(1).png
    1.3 KB · Views: 133
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, we are given:

$$\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{6hu_0}{L}\left(\left(\frac{x}{L} \right)^2+\frac{x}{L} \right)$$

In order to obtain the result you cite via differentiation, it appears that we must assume:

$$x=t\,\therefore\,\frac{dx}{dt}=1$$

Now, the constant in front of the expression involving $x$ will simply be carried through:

$$\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{dy}{dt} \right)=\frac{6hu_0}{L} \frac{d}{dt}\left(\left(\frac{x}{L} \right)^2+\frac{x}{L} \right)$$

Now, can you differentiate term by term on the right, applying the power and chain rules?
 
I'm stuck on how the first expression has the numerator and denominator squared tho.
 
Ah, I did not notice $u_0$ being squared. Can you provide the original problem in its entirety?
 
Surely,
View attachment 2120 gives us the shape of the flight path, but say nothing about the speed of the airliner on that path. Begin by making the unrealistic assumption that horizontal speed is constant during the descent; that is dx/dt=u0 use the chain rule int he form dy/dt=(dy/dx)(dx/dt) to show that vertical velocity of the airliner is View attachment 2121

then use the chain rule to show that the vertical acceleration d2y/dt2 of the airliner along the flight path is View attachment 2122
 

Attachments

  • 7(2).png
    7(2).png
    1.2 KB · Views: 128
  • 7.png
    7.png
    1.3 KB · Views: 137
  • 7(1).png
    7(1).png
    1.3 KB · Views: 124
Last edited:
scook116 said:
Surely, View attachment 2120

also, dx/dt=u0 and dy/dt=(dy/dx)(dx/dt). So sorry >.<

No worries...it just helps to have these details. So, let's begin with:

$$y=\left(\frac{x}{L} \right)^2\left(\frac{2hx}{L}+3h \right)$$

Differentiating with respect to $t$, we obtain:

$$\frac{dy}{dt}=2\left(\frac{x}{L} \right)\left(\frac{1}{L}\frac{dx}{dt} \right)\left(\frac{2hx}{L}+3h \right)+\left(\frac{x}{L} \right)^2\left(\frac{2h}{L}\frac{dx}{dt} \right)$$

Now factoring, we may write (using $$u_0=\frac{dx}{dt}$$):

$$\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{2hu_0}{L}\left(\frac{x}{L} \left(\frac{2x}{L}+3 \right)+ \left(\frac{x}{L} \right)^2 \right)$$

$$\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{6hu_0}{L}\left(\left(\frac{x}{L} \right)^2+\left(\frac{x}{L} \right) \right)$$

So, I do agree with the first derivative you posted. Now differentiate again, observing that $$u_0=\frac{dx}{dt}$$ is a constant:

$$\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{dy}{dt} \right)=\frac{6hu_0}{L} \frac{d}{dt}\left(\left(\frac{x}{L} \right)^2+\frac{x}{L} \right)$$

When you apply the rules of differentiation, you will get the result you cited. Can you give it a try seeing how I derived the first derivative?
 
I end up multiplying out many different expressions with what seems to be too crazy to be part of the solution. I am not sure if I'm picking U and V properly, and I think that might be throwing me in a loop. I end up with multiple expressions, one having 18hu0x^2/L and it just doesn't seem like the right path. :eek:

I have OCD and focus on minute details especially when troubleshooting, I put myself into loops with almost every problem when I start thinking of the proper rules and methods.(Smoking)
 
Let's concentrate on the expression:

$\dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\left(\dfrac{x}{L}\right)^2 + \dfrac{x}{L}\right)$

Linearity of the derivative gives us:

$\dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\left(\dfrac{x}{L}\right)^2 + \dfrac{x}{L}\right)$

$= \dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\left(\dfrac{x}{L}\right)^2 \right) + \dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\dfrac{x}{L}\right)$

Applying the chain rule to the first term gives:

$\dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\left(\dfrac{x}{L}\right)^2 \right) = 2\dfrac{x}{L} \cdot\dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\dfrac{x}{L}\right)$

At this point we have a common factor we can collect, so we have:

$\dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\left(\dfrac{x}{L}\right)^2 + \dfrac{x}{L}\right)$

$= \left(2\dfrac{x}{L} + 1\right)\cdot \dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\dfrac{x}{L}\right)$

Assuming $L$ is a constant, we can bring a factor of $\dfrac{1}{L}$ out front:

$= \dfrac{1}{L}\left(2\dfrac{x}{L} + 1\right)\cdot\dfrac{dx}{dt}$

Since we are given that $\dfrac{dx}{dt} = u_0$, we arrive at:

$\dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\left(\dfrac{x}{L}\right)^2 + \dfrac{x}{L}\right)$

$= \dfrac{u_0}{L}\left(2\dfrac{x}{L} + 1\right)$

and multiplying this by the constant factor:

$\dfrac{6hu_0}{L}$ gives us the "total answer":

$\dfrac{d^2y}{dt^2} = \dfrac{6hu_0^2}{L^2}\left(2\dfrac{x}{L} + 1\right)$
 
Guys, I'm not sure why I haven't been able to see these types of things, I see it now clear as hell but only after you two have helped me. This seems to happen often with me in calc. for example here when you took out "x/L"
Deveno said:
At this point we have a common factor we can collect, so we have:

$\dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\left(\dfrac{x}{L}\right)^2 + \dfrac{x}{L}\right)$

$= \left(2\dfrac{x}{L} + 1\right)\cdot \dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\dfrac{x}{L}\right)$
I didnt see this at all.
Do you guys have ANY tips or tricks at all on how you do operations and or prioritize when doing calculus? I know all about 'go slow, don't miss anything'
 
  • #10
I didn't take out "x/L", I differentiated term-by-term, using the rule:

$(f + g)' = f' + g'$

Since we actually had $f = g^2$ using the chain rule gives us:

$(g^2 + g)' = 2g\cdot g' + g' = (2g + 1)g'$

(Here: $g(t) = \dfrac{x(t)}{L}$).

In general, when differentiating, it is often easier to separate sums first, before applying rules like the product rule or the chain rule, which tend to "expand" as you differentiate. Also, pulling out constant factors first, keeps what you are differentiating "as simple as possible".

"Combining like terms" often just takes a certain "knack" for recognizing "when is the right time to combine". Sometimes it's better to wait until later, sometimes it's better to do it as soon as you can, there's really no hard and fast rule.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K