How is the derivative of y(x,t) derived in quantum mechanics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter strawman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Chain rule
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The derivative of the function y(x,t) = 1/2 h(x-vt) + 1/2 h(x+vt) is derived using the chain rule in quantum mechanics, specifically from the textbook "Quantum Mechanics" by Rae. The correct derivative is dy/dt = h'(x-vt)(-v/2) + h'(x+vt)(v/2), where h' denotes the derivative of the function h. The misunderstanding arose from incorrectly applying the chain rule and substituting h with u without recognizing the need to differentiate h.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chain rule in calculus
  • Familiarity with function composition
  • Knowledge of derivatives and their notation
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in calculus
  • Learn about function composition and its implications in derivatives
  • Explore the properties of derivatives of functions in quantum mechanics
  • Review examples of derivatives from the textbook "Quantum Mechanics" by Rae
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, as well as anyone needing to refresh their understanding of calculus and derivatives.

strawman
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Should be a simple chain rule problem I think.
y(x,t) = 1/2 h(x-vt) + 1/2 h(x+vt)
This is from the textbook "quantum mechancs" by Rae.
The derivative is given as dy/dt = -v1/2 h(x-vt) + v1/2 h(x+vt)
I'm not quite sure how this is? If I use the chain rule and set the function h(x-vt) = u
Then by dy/dt = dy/du x du/dt I will get (for the first part):

dy/du = 1/2
du/dt = -v
dy/dt = -1/2 v

I've obviously misunderstood this somewhere, being a bit rusty on my calculus. Where have I gone wrong?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
strawman said:
Summary: Should be a simple chain rule problem I think.

y(x,t) = 1/2 h(x-vt) + 1/2 h(x+vt)
This is from the textbook "quantum mechancs" by Rae.
The derivative is given as dy/dt = -v1/2 h(x-vt) + v1/2 h(x+vt)
I'm not quite sure how this is? If I use the chain rule and set the function h(x-vt) = u
Then by dy/dt = dy/du x du/dt I will get (for the first part):

dy/du = 1/2
du/dt = -v
dy/dt = -1/2 v

I've obviously misunderstood this somewhere, being a bit rusty on my calculus. Where have I gone wrong?
Thanks!
First, in the correct answer, those should be derivatives of ##h##.

Second, your substitution ##u = h## changes nothing. You just replace ##h## by ##u##. The two functions are identical.

What you can do is let ##u = x - vt##. Then:

##y(x, t) = h(u(x, t)) + \dots ##

It's that function composition to which the chain rule applies:

##\frac{dy}{dt} = h'(u)\frac{du}{dt} + \dots##

Note that it's ##h'## there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: strawman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K