How can I convert the units of B to match the Kennicutt Schimdt law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter matteo86bo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the observed star formation efficiency from the Kennicutt-Schmidt (KS) law, specifically the relationship between gas and stellar surface density. The efficiency constant, A, is approximately 2.5e-4 when measured in M kpc-2 yr-1 and Σgas in M pc-2. The user attempts to compute B from the volumetric star formation rate equation, */dt = B(ρgas/tff), and convert it to match the units of the KS law. The user identifies a potential issue with the dimensional analysis of B, questioning its dimensionality and the correctness of the derived expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Kennicutt-Schmidt law and its implications in astrophysics.
  • Familiarity with volumetric star formation rates and their mathematical representations.
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis and unit conversions in astrophysical contexts.
  • Basic understanding of gravitational physics, particularly free-fall time calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the Kennicutt-Schmidt law and its applications in star formation studies.
  • Learn about dimensional analysis techniques in astrophysics to ensure unit consistency.
  • Explore the implications of free-fall time (tff) in star formation rate equations.
  • Investigate the relationship between volumetric and surface densities in astrophysical contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students studying star formation processes, particularly those interested in the mathematical modeling of the Kennicutt-Schmidt law.

matteo86bo
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to infer the observed star formation efficiency of the Kennicutt Schimdt law starting from a volumetric SF law.
The KS law is a relationship between gas and stellar surface density that we can approximate as:

[itex]\frac{d\Sigma_*}{dt}=A\Sigma_{gas}^{1.5}[/itex]

Where [itex]A[/itex] is the efficiency and its values is roughly 2.5e-4 when [itex]\frac{d\Sigma_*}{dt}[/itex] is measured in [itex]M_\odot kpc^{-2} yr^{-1}[/itex] and [itex]\Sigma_{gas}[/itex] in [itex]M_\odot pc^{-2}[/itex].

Now the problem is I want to derive this efficiency starting from this formula


[itex]\frac{d\rho_*}{dt}=B\frac{\rho_{gas}}{t_{ff}}[/itex]
where [itex]{t_{ff}}[/itex] is the free-falling time and is equal to
[itex]{t_{ff}}=\sqrt{\frac{3}{32\pi G \rho_{gas}}}[/itex]

I need to compute B and then convert it in the same units of the Kennicutt Schimdt law.

2. The attempt at a solution

Since the Kennicutt law involes surface density I have multiplied both sides of the volumetric equation by a characteristic scale length [itex]\Delta x[/itex].

Therefore B should be equal to:

[itex]\sqrt{\frac{32\pi G}{3}} \Delta x[/itex]

The things is I had to convert this number from cgs units to the units in which the Kennicutt law is given but I don't get the same order of magnitude. Can you help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I gave this a shot, but it turns out I'm less able than you are at solving this. I would re-post this question in the Advanced forum if no one else here helps you soon.
 
Let's see if the units are making sense first:

For [itex]\frac{d\rho_*}{dt}=B\frac{\rho_{gas}}{t_{ff}}[/itex] ,

we have [itex]M_\odot pc^{-3} yr^{-1}[/itex] on the left and

B times [itex]M_\odot pc^{-3}[/itex] divided by years on the right , so B should be dimensionless, no? (I'm taking it that the rho's are volume densities.)

So I don't think [itex]B = \sqrt{\frac{32\pi G}{3}} \Delta x[/itex] can be right.(And A has units of [itex]\frac{pc }{ M_\odot^{1/2}\cdot yr}[/itex] ,yes? )
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
17K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
10K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K