How can I correctly perform Fourier inversion of function S(q) to get G(r)?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on performing Fourier inversion of the function S(q) to obtain G(r), specifically referencing equation 7.46. The user expresses difficulty in executing the inversion and seeks assistance, clarifying that this is not a homework query but part of their physics learning. They mention using Wolfram Alpha but receiving results that differ from their textbook, which contains a fundamental error related to the variables used. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the equation and the need for clarification on the inversion process. The user is looking for guidance to resolve discrepancies between their calculations and the textbook results.
enrikofermi
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi all.
I have to do Fourer inversion of an equation 7.46 but I don't know how to do that.
If anybody has any idea it wolud be very helpfull.
Inversion of S(q) is G(r).
 

Attachments

  • IMG1004.jpg
    IMG1004.jpg
    22.2 KB · Views: 379
Physics news on Phys.org
No. I'm learning some physics and need to calculate this to get next step, but i can't. :/
 
Did you try Wolfram Alpha?

I can't see the whole problem, plus it is sideways.
 
No, didn't. That is whole problem, to do Fourier inverse of 7.46. Sorry because it is sideways. :/
 
I have used Wolfram Alpha and got (almost) same result as I calculated earlier. (See pic) But in my book I have r instead of k in denominator. And that result in the book is fundamental! It must be correct. Where have Wolfram and me failed?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    81 KB · Views: 406

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K