MHB How Can I Determine if Two Lie Algebras are Isomorphic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter topsquark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lie algebras
topsquark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
MHB
Messages
2,020
Reaction score
843
I now know of two 3D Lie algebras:

[math]A_1[/math] with brackets [math] \left [ T^0, ~T^{\pm} \right ] = \pm 2 T^{\pm} [/math], [math] \left [ T^+, ~ T^- \right ] = T^0[/math]

and one with brackets:

[math] \left [ T^0, ~T^{\pm} \right ] = T^{\mp}[/math] and [math] \left [ T^+,~ T^- \right ] = T^0[/math]

How can I tell if these two are representations of the same thing? (Up to an isomorphism, anyway.) My thought is to show that the adjoint representation generators are similar. Using matrices that is to say a matrix S exists such that [math]T_a' = ST^aS^{-1}[/math]. Is this an acceptable way to show the existence of an isomorphism?

-Dan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think the algebra I found is isomorphic to A1. A1 has a 2 x 2 matrix representation but the other does not.

The similarity method seems to be out, so I was barking up the wrong tree. But even though I answered my own question here my problem still remains in general: How do I show if two Lie Algebras are the same? Is there a way to decompose a Lie algebra in a similar way to finding irreducible representations of a group?

-Dan
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top