How can I find reliable sources of information on the LHC and its experiments?

AI Thread Summary
Reliable sources for information on the LHC and its experiments can be found on the CERN website, which offers details about detectors and relevant physics topics. For specific areas like the Higgs boson, antimatter, dark matter, additional dimensions, and quark-gluon plasma, it's important to note that while the LHC has not discovered dark matter or additional dimensions, it has contributed significantly to research in these fields. Utilizing lecture notes from courses on LHC physics and blogs that simplify complex topics can also be beneficial. Accessing physics journals may require navigating platforms like Google Scholar, and looking for specific results from LHCb can provide valuable insights. Overall, focusing on how the LHC has advanced understanding in these areas, rather than solely on discoveries, will strengthen the research.
MojoMcGunner
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm sorry that this is probably in the wrong place, but I couldn't find a place to post where I am allowed to start threads which was relevant.

I'm hopefully starting a degree in particle physics next year, I'm currently in my last year of high school. Myself and one other student at my school are doing a physics EPQ, which is a qualification which will help me to get into universities, basically you choose a topic related to the degree to which you are applying, then write a 5,000 word essay and do a presentation to very highly qualified people on it, to be judged by the standards of a first or second year degree undergrad.

Basically, I'm having real trouble finding reliable resources. My topic is what has been discovered by the LHC, so I'm doing 5 sections on the Higg's boson, antimatter, dark matter, additional dimensions and quark-gluon plasma. I have some basic info from the CERN website about the different detectors, but not as detailed as I'll probably need. I will have to explain the physics of the matter (hehe, no pun intended), how it was detected/deduced using the LHC and that knowledge means.

My problem is that I know the basics of those areas, so "introduction to" articles/sites aren't helpful, but I don't have the level of education to understand the fully professional ones designed to be read by people who have PhDs.

I can't work out how to use google scholar effectively and I can't afford to buy the pdf files. Can anyone please help me out a lot and recommend some sites/resources which I could use to build a good, detailed understanding of these topics, but which don't assume you already have a degree?

Or just give me general advice on how to find what I'm looking for would be even better. Give a man a fish and all that... is there a good way to locate reliable sources of information at the level I want?

Thankyou very much, this will be very helpful if someone is good enough to help me with this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've not looked at the Cern website for awhile but have you tried there?
 
Look for lecture notes of courses like "LHC Physics", "Particle detectors" or something similar.

For specific topics, there are some blogs where the explanations do not require too much knowledge.

Concerning your topics:
- Peter Higgs already has the s in his name, it is not "Higg's". The Higgs boson is a nice topic.
- Antimatter was not discovered at the LHC, and CP violation ("difference between matter and antimatter") might be a bit tricky in this context. Explain that antimatter is common there, but I would not go into details there. In fact, physicists rarely care about "this is matter" and "this is antimatter", because the definition is pointless for many particles anyway. If you want to keep this topic, look for some LHCb results.
- dark matter was not discovered at the LHC. I would call this "search for supersymmetric [or other new] particles"
- additional dimensions... well, why not. Again, was not discovered.
- Quark-gluon plasma: Not new, but ALICE is a nice detector to observe it.
 
mfb said:
Look for lecture notes of courses like "LHC Physics", "Particle detectors" or something similar.

For specific topics, there are some blogs where the explanations do not require too much knowledge.

Concerning your topics:
- Peter Higgs already has the s in his name, it is not "Higg's". The Higgs boson is a nice topic.
- Antimatter was not discovered at the LHC, and CP violation ("difference between matter and antimatter") might be a bit tricky in this context. Explain that antimatter is common there, but I would not go into details there. In fact, physicists rarely care about "this is matter" and "this is antimatter", because the definition is pointless for many particles anyway. If you want to keep this topic, look for some LHCb results.
- dark matter was not discovered at the LHC. I would call this "search for supersymmetric [or other new] particles"
- additional dimensions... well, why not. Again, was not discovered.
- Quark-gluon plasma: Not new, but ALICE is a nice detector to observe it.


Sorry for the Higgs typo. The reason I wanted to do matter/antimatter is because then I can do a whole things about the LHCb. I basically chose the topics based on the CERN website and the websites for the individual detectors. I don't think it really matters that the LHC didn't discover them, as long as it has some relevant and interesting results concerning them, I could just do it in terms of how it's advanced the areas.


The CERN website has some good information about the detectors but I need to get some reliable info about the actual experiments and results. I'll probably need to get some physics journals, but I don't know how get hold of them, or how to find what I need. Gah.
 
Ok, let's see about CP violation:

The decay B^- \to D^0(\to K^+ K^-)K^- is more frequent than the decay B^+ \to \overline{D}^0(\to K^- K^+)K^+ (just the antiparticles everywhere). The brackets denote the decay of the D0 into two kaons.
The difference is so large that you can see it by eye in the graphs: Talk, slide 8, upper plots. The x-axis is the reconstructed B meson mass, the y-axis the count for each reconstructed mass bin. The left red peak is higher than the right one.
Slide 9 and 10 show the same, but with different D0 decay channels.

The LHCb news have this really annoying feature that you cannot link individual news articles, but at least there is an anchor you can find in the page source...
See the link for another example of CP violation.

And LHCb has this 3.5 standard deviations deviation from an old theory prediction for charm mixing. http://lhcb.web.cern.ch/lhcb/lhcb_page/physics_results/recent_lhcb_results/Search_for_CP_violation_in_charm.html has a lot of useful links.You can search the Cern courier for some interesting news.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Back
Top