How can I find the torque/moment of force about an axis?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the torque (moment of force) about an axis for a problem involving two cables supporting a structure. The tension in cable BD is 900 N and in cable FE is 675 N. The torque is calculated using the formula τ = r × F, where the position vector r is determined as r = -2.5i + 2j. The unit vector e is derived from the force vector, leading to the final torque expression T = 9k - 9j. Participants clarify the correct components of the vectors involved and emphasize the importance of accurate vector representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector mathematics and cross products
  • Familiarity with torque and its calculation using τ = r × F
  • Knowledge of unit vectors and their significance in physics
  • Basic principles of static equilibrium in mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the cross product in three-dimensional vector analysis
  • Learn about static equilibrium and its conditions in mechanical systems
  • Explore the concept of unit vectors and their role in force calculations
  • Practice problems involving torque calculations in various mechanical scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering courses, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as professionals involved in structural analysis and design.

GaussianSurface

Homework Statement


The Trump's wall is so weak that has to be supported by two cables as is shown in the figure. If the tension over the cables BD and FE are 900 N and 675 N respectively.

(I'LL UPLOAD AN IMAGE OF THE PROBLEM SO YOU CAN SEE IT)

Homework Equations



τ = r χ F
Mo = r χ F

The Attempt at a Solution


e= unitary vector
ra= 1.5i + 2j + 2k
ιeι= √1.5^2+2^2+2^2
ιeι= 3.20

e= 0.46i + 0.62j + 0.62k
............
F= 900(0.46i+0.62+0.62k)
F= 414i+558j+558k)

and by performing the determinant of the torque

T= r χ F
T= 9k - 9j

That's what I got by doing it but i don't really know if I'm okay. Hope someone can help me
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    36.8 KB · Views: 608
  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    36.8 KB · Views: 592
  • 21909052_1430282113693707_2004416146_o.jpg
    21909052_1430282113693707_2004416146_o.jpg
    37.2 KB · Views: 618
Physics news on Phys.org
GaussianSurface said:
The Trump's wall is so weak that has to be supported by two cables as is shown in the figure.
It was only a matter of time before these types of problems started showing up.:oldlaugh:
GaussianSurface said:
T= 9k - 9j
I don't think this answer is correct. I'm also not sure what the unit vector you are calculating is for.

Since the torque is given by ##\tau=\mathbf{r}\times\mathbf{F}##, we first need to find the vectors ##\mathbf{r}## and ##\mathbf{F}##. Can you show what you get for these?
 
NFuller said:
It was only a matter of time before these types of problems started showing up.:oldlaugh:

I don't think this answer is correct. I'm also not sure what the unit vector you are calculating is for.

Since the torque is given by ##\tau=\mathbf{r}\times\mathbf{F}##, we first need to find the vectors ##\mathbf{r}## and ##\mathbf{F}##. Can you show what you get for these?
I wrote it above
the r what I got was 1.5i + 2j + 2 k
and the force we know that in order to compute this is the module of F by the unitary vector ''e''
then F= ιFι e
since I've got F which is equal to 900 I just got to multiply by the unitary vector which is defined by the formula of e= e/ιeι
P.S: I don't know how to write absolute values so I try as much as I can so the problem can be well specified.
 
NFuller said:
It was only a matter of time before these types of problems started showing up.:oldlaugh:

I don't think this answer is correct. I'm also not sure what the unit vector you are calculating is for.

Since the torque is given by ##\tau=\mathbf{r}\times\mathbf{F}##, we first need to find the vectors ##\mathbf{r}## and ##\mathbf{F}##. Can you show what you get for these?
Haha I live in Mexico and my teacher is kinda funny with this problems he knows how to make problems LOL
 
GaussianSurface said:
the r what I got was 1.5i + 2j + 2 k
There is no ##\hat{k}## component for ##\mathbf{r}##.
GaussianSurface said:
and the force we know that in order to compute this is the module of F by the unitary vector ''e''
then F= ιFι e
I see. The unit vector ##\mathbf{e}## is not quite right. The ##\hat{i}## and ##\hat{j}## components should have the same magnitude but ##\hat{i}## needs to be negative.
 
NFuller said:
There is no ##\hat{k}## component for ##\mathbf{r}##.

I see. The unit vector ##\mathbf{e}## is not quite right. The ##\hat{i}## and ##\hat{j}## components should have the same magnitude but ##\hat{i}## needs to be negative.

Damn, then it'd be like this?

r = -1.5 i + 2 j ?
or
r = -2 i + 2 j ?
what i do not know is if I am going to substract the meter to the 2.5, please tell me if that is okay or what...
 
The components of ##\mathbf{r}## are composed of the distance in x and distance in y it takes to go from the point ##O## to the point ##B##.
 
NFuller said:
The components of ##\mathbf{r}## are composed of the distance in x and distance in y it takes to go from the point ##O## to the point ##B##.

Mmm i think i got it so:

r = -2.5i + 2j

and then i can find the module of r and then the unitary vector so next i can perform the determinant and i'll got the torque?
 
GaussianSurface said:
r = 2.5i + 2j
This looks good. Now what is your result for ##\mathbf{e}##?
 
  • #10
NFuller said:
This looks good. Now what is your result for ##\mathbf{e}##?

The module will be
r= √6.25+4 = 3.20
e= -0.78i + 0.62j
am I right?
because i actually did one like this but i thought i was wrong even though my components were wrong LOL
 

Attachments

  • 21951346_1430341187021133_2038317970_o.jpg
    21951346_1430341187021133_2038317970_o.jpg
    34.4 KB · Views: 565
  • #11
##\mathbf{e}## points in the direction of the cable. So it will have all three components ##\hat{i}##, ##\hat{j}##, and ##\hat{k}##. To find ##\mathbf{e}##, find the vector that points from ##B## to ##D## then divide it by the length of the vector.
 
  • #12
NFuller said:
##\mathbf{e}## points in the direction of the cable. So it will have all three components ##\hat{i}##, ##\hat{j}##, and ##\hat{k}##. To find ##\mathbf{e}##, find the vector that points from ##B## to ##D## then divide each compo

e= 1i - 2j + 4k ?
and the i divide
 
  • #13
The vector pointing down the length of the cable is ##-1\hat{i}-2\hat{j}+2\hat{k}## now divide this vector by its length to get ##\mathbf{e}##.
 
  • #14
GaussianSurface said:
r = -1.5 i + 2 j ?
You are switching between +1.5i and -1.5i. Which way are you defining the i axis? Is the direction OC positive or negative?
GaussianSurface said:
find the module of r and then the unitary vector
Why are you finding the modulus of the r vector? You want the unit vector in the force direction in order to find the vector F.
 
  • #15
NFuller said:
The vector pointing down the length of the cable is ##-1\hat{i}-2\hat{j}+2\hat{k}## now divide this vector by its length to get ##\mathbf{e}##.

e = -0.32i - 0.62j + 0.62k
then i can multply e by the force
so then, i'll be able to perform the derminant right? since i got r and F
 
  • #16
haruspex said:
You are switching between +1.5i and -1.5i. Which way are you defining the i axis? Is the direction OC positive or negative?

Why are you finding the modulus of the r vector? You want the unit vector in the force direction in order to find the vector F.
Well, my teacher told me to find the module so i can find the e
 
  • #17
GaussianSurface said:
e = -0.32i - 0.62j + 0.62k
Something is still not right. You need to divide by the length of the vector which is ##\sqrt{(-1)^{2}+(-2)^{2}+(2)^{2}}##.
 
  • #18
GaussianSurface said:
Well, my teacher told me in order to find the module of it
NFuller said:
Something is still not right. You need to divide by the length of the vector which is ##\sqrt{(-1)^{2}+(-2)^{2}+(2)^{2}}##.
You mean the module, right?
 
  • #19
GaussianSurface said:
Well, my teacher told me to find the module so i can find the e
Yes, but you were finding e of the wrong vector. In post #10 you found the modulus of the r vector, which is not helpful. You want the unit vector in the direction of the force.
I see NFuller put you on the right track in post #11.
 
  • #20
GaussianSurface said:
You mean the module, right?

e= -1/√5 -2/√5+2/√5
 
  • #21
GaussianSurface said:
e= -1/√5 -2/√5+2/√5
I do not think you are using the terminology correctly, and the √5 is wrong.
Given a vector (-1,-2,2), its modulus (not module) is √((-1)2+(-2)2+22)=3. This is a scalar.
The e vector would mean the unit vector in the direction of the original vector, and that is obtained by dividing by the modulus, giving (-1/3,-2/3,2/3).
 
Last edited:
  • #22
GaussianSurface said:
e= -1/√5 -2/√5+2/√5
You need to put the unit vectors in. The magnitude is not ##\sqrt{5}## it is 3 as haruspex said.
 
  • #23
NFuller said:
Yes, that's right.
No it is not. Please see post #21.
 
  • #24
haruspex said:
No it is not. Please see post #21.
Yes sorry, I just corrected my post
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
15K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
335
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K