How can i get an initial speed without acceleration or time?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a collision between a 4WD vehicle and a stationary car, with details about skid marks, distances traveled post-collision, and vehicle masses. The goal is to determine the initial speed of the 4WD before braking, using given parameters such as the coefficient of friction and gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the coefficient of friction to calculate initial speeds after the crash and question the validity of their assumptions regarding braking distances. Some explore the possibility of calculating additional distance traveled if the crash had not occurred.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering various approaches to estimate the initial speed. Some have provided calculations based on assumed parameters, while others are questioning the assumptions made regarding distances and forces involved. There is no explicit consensus on the correct method or outcome yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating constraints such as the lack of time data and the need to rely on kinematic equations. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the relationship between acceleration, time, and initial speed, which remains a point of exploration in the discussion.

physical..O.o
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
How can i get an initial speed without acceleration or time??

Homework Statement



Hi..heres the problem:
A 4WD traveling East has collided with a stationary car, the 4WD's skid marks are 15m long until the point of collision. The 4WD is sent 35degs South for 15.8m and the car is sent 55degs North for 15m. The car has a mass of 1150kg and the 4WD's is 1600kg. .The coefficient of friction is 0.6.
Find the initial speed of the 4WD before braking in km/h.
this is ALL the info included...

Homework Equations



s=displacement, mu=0.6, v=final velocity, u=initial velocity, P=momentum, Pi=initial momentum (also just the momentum of 4WD before crash), Pf=final momentum, P'1=momentum of 4WD after collison, P'2=momentum of car after collision, g=gravity(9.8please), a=acceleration t=time ( numbers after pronumerals signify which vehicle: 4WD=1 , Car=2...dashes between pronumeral and vehicle number mean after the crash eg: P'1)

u= sqr root ( 2mu*g*s)

P=mv

pythagorus= to add the final momentums to get the initial momentum

v^2=u^2 + 2as

s=ut+1/2 at^2 ...(1/2 = half)

v=u+at

The Attempt at a Solution



to find initial speeds after the crash:
u'1= sqr root:(2*0.6*9.8*15.8)
u'1= 13.63m/s

u'2= sqr root:(2*0.6*9.8*15*)
u'2= 13.28m/2

to find the initial momentum (initial momentum of 4WD)
Pi^2 = (m'1*u'1)^2 + (m'2*u'2)^2
Pi^2=(1600*13.63)^2 + (1150*13.28)^2
Pi= 26623.727 kgm/s
then to find v1= (26623.727)/(1600)
v1= 16.63m/s

from there on i don't know what to do.. I've been advised that the last answer (16.63m/s) was the final speed before the collison...is that right? if so, how can i find the initial speed before braking? I am guessing i have to find acceleration, but i don't know how to without time, and visa versa... apparently the initial speed is in the 70's km/h...:S please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Perhaps you are to assume the coefficient of friction during braking is also 0.6? What answer do you get if you assume that?
 


thanks!
NascentOxygen said:
Perhaps you are to assume the coefficient of friction during braking is also 0.6? What answer do you get if you assume that?

do you mean by using the initial speed formula?

u= √2mugs

u=√(2*0.6*9.8*15)

u= 13.28ms-1

its the wrong answer if that's what you meant because 15m isn't the whole distance the 4WD would have taken to stop as it crashed before it could...but do you think that if i could find the extra amount of distance it would have traveled if it didnt crash into the car, then added that to the braking distance of 15m and then used the u= √2mugs rule that it might work?
 


If i add the vectors of 15m and 15.8 m i get :
unknown distance after crash if crash didnt happen= √(15^2 + 15.8^2)
= 21.79m
then if i add that to the initial braking distance:
= 21.79 + 15
= 36.79m
and use that in u= √(2mugs)
u= √(2*0.6*9.8*36.79)
u= 20.8ms-1
u= 74.9kmh-1
the speed is said to be in the 70's...so maybe this is correct?!? =D
 


Let's assume your figure of v1= 16.63m/s[/color] is correct (because I haven't checked it).

Before the collision, can we say the vehicle had decellerated over a distance of 15m by a braking force of μ·m·g?

Use v² = u² + 2as

You won't obtain 70kph, but I'm yet to be convinced of the correct answer. :wink:
 


I know this question will be solved using law of conservation of momentum and/or some other higher principles which i haven't read yet..and i was thus trying with basic kinematics principles

The car that is sent north travels 15 meters and taking final velocity to be zero and a=-6ms-2 we can get the initial velocity=6√5 ms-1.. Now my doubt is-(for the same car) v know what velocity it attained,v know that it attained it from rest..we also know that the time period it took to do so was infinitely small and so can v not somehow figure out the total acceleration it underwent(using calculus maybe-that deals with very small intervals of time..i don't know) and thus the force with which it was hit and thus the velocity with which the body hitting it was traveling with??

Sorry this all may be making no sense but i had to ask!
 


Shivam123 said:
The car that is sent north travels 15 meters and taking final velocity to be zero and a=-6ms-2
Where did a=-6ms⁻² come from?
the time period it took to do so was infinitely small
Not infinitely small, but we have no idea how small.
 


NascentOxygen said:
Let's assume your figure of v1= 16.63m/s[/color] is correct (because I haven't checked it).
I have checked it now. 16.63m/sec is close enough. You might have to rethink your method if the paths were not exactly perpendicularhttps://www.physicsforums.com/images/icons/icon4.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:


NascentOxygen said:
Where did a=-6ms⁻² come from?
.

(0.6 times normal reaction)/mass..i assumed it's coefficient f kinetic friction
 
  • #10


NascentOxygen said:
but we have no idea how small.

Well that is what u call infinitely small don't you! when you can only imagine how very very small it was.
 
  • #11


We know the time of interaction is not infinitely short. Maybe of indefinite duration?
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K