How can I properly use significant figures in scientific experiments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsbanana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiments
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of significant figures in scientific experiments, particularly in the context of converting mass measurements from grams to kilograms.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to validate their conversion of mass from grams to kilograms while considering significant figures. Some participants question the accuracy of the mass measurement and how it affects significant figures. Others suggest that the accuracy of the mass should be clarified before proceeding with conversions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring various interpretations of significant figures and their application to the original poster's mass measurement. Participants are providing insights on the importance of accuracy and how it influences the representation of significant figures, but no consensus has been reached regarding the original poster's specific situation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the accuracy of the mass measurement is crucial for determining significant figures, and there is an emphasis on the need for additional information regarding the mass's precision.

physicsbanana
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am having trouble with significant figuress in experiments! Thanks for any help you provide!

I have an experiment where I pick the mass, and I chose 200g. So if I want to convert this to mks units i would do the following:

200g x (1kg/1000g) = 0.2kg

Is this calculation correct/valid? Then my mass will have one sig fig because of the 200g value.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need start by knowing how accurate the 200g is. If it's accurate to within +/- .005g then it's 200.00g; if it's only accurate to the nearest 5g then it's 2.0 102g. Once you have that right, expressing in kg is easy.
 
That's what i don't get...I picked a 200g mass and used it

How do I known how many significant digits if it was not a given value?

I used a 200g metal mass that was labeled "200g". Isn't this number perfect?
 
Nothing in the macroscopic real world is exact. The set of masses should come with some statement regarding their accuracy. If not, weigh it on the most accurate balance you have and use the known accuracy of the balance.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K