MHB How can I prove the rank of a matrix with a specific pattern of entries?

  • Thread starter Thread starter A.Magnus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix rank
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that a specific square matrix, with 1's on the diagonal and entries of $\frac{1}{k}$ elsewhere, has a rank of $k$. A suggested approach involves assuming the column vectors are not linearly independent and demonstrating a contradiction. By summing the column vectors and manipulating them, it is shown that they can produce standard unit vectors, indicating their independence. This leads to the conclusion that the rank of the matrix is indeed $k$. The conversation emphasizes the importance of linear combinations in establishing vector independence.
A.Magnus
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
I would love to get help on this problem: Suppose that $M$ is a square $k \times k$ matrix with entries of 1's in the main diagonal and entries of $\frac{1}{k}$ for all others. Show that the rank of $M$ is $k$.

I think I should go about by contradiction, that is, by assuming that the column vectors are not linearly independent. Since there are $k$ number of column vectors, then hopefully I can show that the rank of $M$ is indeed $k$. Unfortunately I don't know how to put these ideas down in writing; your time and gracious helps are therefore very much appreciated. Thank you - MA
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
MaryAnn said:
I would love to get help on this problem: Suppose that $M$ is a square $k \times k$ matrix with entries of 1's in the main diagonal and entries of $\frac{1}{k}$ for all others. Show that the rank of $M$ is $k$.

I think I should go about by contradiction, that is, by assuming that the column vectors are not linearly independent. Since there are $k$ number of column vectors, then hopefully I can show that the rank of $M$ is indeed $k$. Unfortunately I don't know how to put these ideas down in writing; your time and gracious helps are therefore very much appreciated. Thank you.

Hi MaryAnn! Welcome to MHB! ;)

Suppose we add all column vectors together and divide by $1+\frac{k-1}k$, then we get:
$$\begin{bmatrix}1\\ 1\\ \vdots \\ 1\end{bmatrix}$$
Now subtract $k$ times the first column vector:
$$\begin{bmatrix}1\\ 1\\ \vdots \\ 1\end{bmatrix}
- k\begin{bmatrix}1\\ 1/k\\ \vdots \\ 1/k\end{bmatrix}
=\begin{bmatrix}1-k\\ 0\\ \vdots \\ 0\end{bmatrix}
$$
Hey! That's a multiple of a standard unit vector!
Moreover, we can get each unit vector from a linear combination of the column vectors.
Therefore the column vectors are independent.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi MaryAnn! Welcome to MHB! ;)

Suppose we add all column vectors together and divide by $1+\frac{k-1}k$, then we get:
$$\begin{bmatrix}1\\ 1\\ \vdots \\ 1\end{bmatrix}$$
Now subtract $k$ times the first column vector:
$$\begin{bmatrix}1\\ 1\\ \vdots \\ 1\end{bmatrix}
- k\begin{bmatrix}1\\ 1/k\\ \vdots \\ 1/k\end{bmatrix}
=\begin{bmatrix}1-k\\ 0\\ \vdots \\ 0\end{bmatrix}
$$
Hey! That's a multiple of a standard unit vector!
Moreover, we can get each unit vector from a linear combination of the column vectors.
Therefore the column vectors are independent.

Thank you for your gracious help! This is more than just a genius' solution. - MA
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K