C/C++ How can I seed srand() with time in microseconds in Visual Basic/C++?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pazmush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Seed
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on seeding the `srand()` function in Visual Basic C++ with time in microseconds. A participant suggests using `QueryPerformanceCounter()` for this purpose, as it provides high-resolution timing on Windows. An example code snippet is provided to demonstrate its implementation. However, there is a clarification that Visual Basic and C++ are distinct languages, and the term "Visual Basic C++" is incorrect. Additionally, it is noted that seeding the random number generator (RNG) with microsecond precision may not be necessary, as using a single seed for multiple experiments can yield better randomness.
pazmush
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi

Im using Visual basic c++ and was wonderig what the easiest way was to seed srand() with the time in microseconds is.

Thanks
 
Technology news on Phys.org
pazmush said:
Im using Visual basic c++
Which do you mean ?
If you mean c++ you can seed srand() with QueryPerformanceCounter() it's the nearest you will get to a microsecond timer on windows.
 
Cool that seems like a good plan, unfortunately, i don't know how to use QueryPerformanceCounter(), do you think you could explain it a little bit?

Thanks
 
Easy:

Code:
#include <windows.h>

int main()
{
  LARGE_INTEGER cicles;

  QueryPerformanceCounter(&cicles);
  srand (cicles.QuadPart);

  return 0;
}
 
pazmush said:
Hi

Im using Visual basic c++ and was wonderig what the easiest way was to seed srand() with the time in microseconds is.

Thanks

There is no such thing as Visual basic c++. There is Visual Basic and there is C++, they are too completely different languages. There's also Visual Studio which contains the Visual C++ compiler.

Also, there is almost no conceivable reason why you should want to seed the RNG with microsecond precision. If you're doing multiple experiments and you want random initial values, you should be doing them in the random sequence from 1 initial seed, not re-seeding it each time.
 
I tried a web search "the loss of programming ", and found an article saying that all aspects of writing, developing, and testing software programs will one day all be handled through artificial intelligence. One must wonder then, who is responsible. WHO is responsible for any problems, bugs, deficiencies, or whatever malfunctions which the programs make their users endure? Things may work wrong however the "wrong" happens. AI needs to fix the problems for the users. Any way to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K