MHB How can I show that K is positive-definite?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hi! :)

I have also an other question about the proof of the Cholesky decomposition.
We write A like that:
$A=\begin{bmatrix}
d & u^{T}\\
u & H
\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}
\sqrt d & 0\\
\frac{u}{\sqrt d} & I_{n-1}
\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0\\
0 & K
\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}
\sqrt d & \frac{u^{T}}{\sqrt{d}}\\
0 & I_{n-1}
\end{bmatrix}$

where $K=H-\frac{1}{d}uu^{T}$

and then we suppose that $K$ is symmetric and positive-definite,to use the assumption step(that is valid for $(n-1)x(n-1)$ symmetric and positive-definite matrices.
But...then I have to prove that $K$ is positive-definite.How can I do this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hi! :)

I have also an other question about the proof of the Cholesky decomposition.
We write A like that:
$A=\begin{bmatrix}
d & u^{T}\\
u & H
\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}
\sqrt d & 0\\
\frac{u}{\sqrt d} & I_{n-1}
\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0\\
0 & K
\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}
\sqrt d & \frac{u^{T}}{\sqrt{d}}\\
0 & I_{n-1}
\end{bmatrix}$

where $K=H-\frac{1}{d}uu^{T}$

and then we suppose that $K$ is symmetric and positive-definite,to use the assumption step(that is valid for $(n-1)x(n-1)$ symmetric and positive-definite matrices.
But...then I have to prove that $K$ is positive-definite.How can I do this?

Do I have to use the condition $x^{T}Ax>0$ ?
 
evinda said:
Hi! :)

I have also an other question about the proof of the Cholesky decomposition.
We write A like that:
$A=\begin{bmatrix}
d & u^{T}\\
u & H
\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}
\sqrt d & 0\\
\frac{u}{\sqrt d} & I_{n-1}
\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0\\
0 & K
\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}
\sqrt d & \frac{u^{T}}{\sqrt{d}}\\
0 & I_{n-1}
\end{bmatrix}$

where $K=H-\frac{1}{d}uu^{T}$

and then we suppose that $K$ is symmetric and positive-definite,to use the assumption step(that is valid for $(n-1)x(n-1)$ symmetric and positive-definite matrices.
But...then I have to prove that $K$ is positive-definite.How can I do this?
The matrix $P = \begin{bmatrix} \sqrt d & 0\\ \frac1{\sqrt d}u & I_{n-1} \end{bmatrix}$ is invertible, because its determinant is the product of its diagonal entries, namely $\sqrt d.$ But $A = P \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0\\ 0 & K \end{bmatrix}P^*,$ and $A$ is positive definite. Therefore $\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0\\ 0 & K \end{bmatrix} = P^{-1}A(P^{-1})^*$ is positive definite. Hence $K$, which is a corner of that matrix, is also positive definite.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top