MHB How Can I Tackle Difficult Questions Effectively?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaychay
  • Start date Start date
jaychay
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
q6.png


Can you please help me
Thank you in advance
I am really struggle with this questions
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Test for divergence:

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \lim_{k \to \infty}{ \left( \frac{k}{3\,k^{\frac{4}{3}} - 1} \right) } &= \lim_{k \to \infty}{ \left( \frac{1}{4\,k^{\frac{1}{3}}} \right) } \textrm{ By L'Hospital's Rule} \\
&= 0 \end{align*}$

so it has a CHANCE of converging.

Test for absolute convergence:

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sum_{k = 2}^{\infty}{ \left( \frac{k}{3\,k^{\frac{4}{3}} - 1} \right) } &= \sum_{k = 2}^{\infty}{ \left( \frac{1}{3\,k^{\frac{1}{3}} - \frac{1}{k}} \right) } \\ &\sim \sum_{k = 2}^{\infty}{ \left( \frac{1}{3\,k^{\frac{1}{3}}} \right) } \\ &= \frac{1}{3} \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}{ \left( \frac{1}{k^{\frac{1}{3}}} \right) } \end{align*}$

which is known to be a divergent p-series. So the positive term series would also diverge by the limit comparison (you can check the limit yourself).

Test for conditional convergence: Since it's an alternating series, we just need to show that the terms are decreasing.

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} f(x) &= \frac{x}{3\,x^{\frac{4}{3}} - 1} \\
f'\left( x \right) &= -\frac{\left( x^{\frac{4}{3}} + 1 \right) }{\left( 3\,x^{\frac{4}{3}} - 1 \right) ^2 } \end{align*}$

which is very clearly negative for all $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x > 0 \end{align*}$. Thus the terms (which are on the function) also decrease.

Therefore the series is CONDITIONALLY CONVERGENT by the Alternating Series Test.
 
and I am not sure where to begin. any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Hi there,

I would be happy to help you with your questions. Can you provide more information or context about the questions you are struggling with? This way, I can better understand the problem and provide more specific guidance. Looking forward to hearing back from you.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K