How Can Jensen's Inequality Be Used to Prove a Vector Magnitude Relationship?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jeff.Nevington
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the application of Jensen's Inequality to prove a vector magnitude relationship involving the sum of the absolute values of vector elements. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and theoretical exploration of inequalities.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an inequality involving a vector B and proposes to prove that the sum of its absolute values raised to a power is greater than or equal to a scaled mean of those absolute values.
  • Another participant suggests that the function involved is strictly convex and proposes using Jensen's Inequality to establish the inequality, noting that equality holds under specific conditions.
  • A third participant relates the discussion to the inequality of arithmetic and geometric means, referencing external sources for further context.
  • A later reply expresses appreciation for the mention of Jensen's Inequality and indicates that additional resources were helpful.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the relevance of Jensen's Inequality to the problem, but the discussion does not resolve whether the proposed inequality is definitively proven or accepted without further elaboration.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the conditions of the inequality and the properties of the vector elements remain unspecified, such as the implications of the condition that the absolute elements of B are not all identical.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in mathematical inequalities, vector analysis, and applications of Jensen's Inequality may find this discussion relevant.

Jeff.Nevington
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
I have a vector B of length N, I would like to prove that:

n=0 to N-1 (|Bn|x) ≥ Nαx

where:
x > 1;
α = (1/N) * ∑n=0 to N-1 (|Bn|) (i.e., The mean of the absolute elements of B).
and ∑n=0 to N-1 (||Bn|-α|) ≠ 0; (i.e., The absolute elements of B are not all identical).

I believe the above to be true, but I am struggling to find the most elegant way to state it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
notationally this isn't great, but it seems that you have a function ##f##

where ##f(y) = y^\alpha##

for real non-negative ##y## and ##\alpha \gt 1##. Differentiate twice and show second derivative to be positive for any ##y\gt 0## (this is an easy way to confirm strict convexity).

If you divide both sides by ##N## then your inequality can be stated as

##E\Big[f\big(Y\big)\Big] \geq f\Big(E\big[Y\big]\Big)##

by Jensen's Inequality
with equality iff ##y_1 = y_2 = ... = y_n##

- - - -
edit: it's probably better to view this as a specific case of a Power Mean Inequality (which you'd in turn prove with help of convexity)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumQuest and Jeff.Nevington
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumQuest and Jeff.Nevington
Thanks a lot! Jensen's Inequality, was what I was looking for. The Wiki page on mean inequality was also useful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K