How can Lambert's equation be used to solve for x?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter psyclone
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the equation 2Ln(x+4)+1=x using Lambert's W-function. The solutions identified are x = -3.91 and x = 5.50. The participants emphasize the importance of using Lambert's Transcendental Equation for substitution, specifically transforming the equation into the form Ln u = a u^b, where b = 1. The final solution involves manipulating the equation to express it in terms of the W-function, leading to the conclusion that v = W(-1/(2e^(-5/2))).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic functions and properties, specifically natural logarithms (Ln).
  • Familiarity with Lambert's W-function and its applications in solving transcendental equations.
  • Basic knowledge of exponential functions and their inverses.
  • Ability to perform algebraic manipulations and substitutions in equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of Lambert's W-function in detail.
  • Learn how to manipulate and solve transcendental equations using substitution methods.
  • Explore examples of equations that can be solved using the W-function beyond the given context.
  • Investigate the implications of using logarithmic identities in solving complex equations.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus or advanced algebra, and anyone interested in solving complex equations involving logarithms and transcendental functions.

psyclone
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I had a little problem which I'd like to have answered by anyone who has a-little time to spend!

How to solve for x, given the following;

2Ln(x+4)+1=x ?

the solutions are x= -3.91.. & 5.50..

Wolfram-alpha solves the problem using 'Lamberts W-function', which makes sense because using the inverse property of logs with exponents will not simplify this problem at all.

But by using Using Lambert's Transcendental Equation, with the correct substitution of 'x' for another variable say 'u', I think it can be solved.

Ln u = a u^b {b = 1}

solution: u = exp [ -W(-a*b)/b ] , where W( ) is Lambert's W-function.

Your thoughts?

{http://mathworld.wol...W-Function.html }
{http://mathworld.wol...alEquation.html }
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the given equation involves "ln" and Lambert's W function solves [itex]xe^x= constant[/itex], I would get the logarithm alone, then take the exponential of both sides. First simplify: 2ln(x+ 4)= x- 1 so ln(x+ 4)= (x- 1)/2. Then [itex]x+ 4= e^{(x- 1)/2}= e^{x/2}e^{-1/2}[/itex] and write that as [itex](x+ 4)e^{-x/2}= e^{-1/2}[/itex].

Now, let u= x+ 4 so that x= u- 4 and [itex]e^{-x/2}= e^{-(u- 4)/2}= e^{-u/2}e^{2}[/itex]. In terms of u, the equation is now [itex]ue^{-u/2}e^{2}= e^{-1/2}[/itex] or [itex]ue^{-u/2}= e^{-2- 1/2}= e^{-5/2}[/itex]. Finally, let v= -u/2. Then u= -2v so we have [itex]-2ve^v= e^{-5/2}[/itex] or [itex]ve^v= -\frac{e^{-3/2}}{2}[/itex] and [itex]v= W\left(-\frac{e^{-3/2}}{2}\right)[/itex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thx for your post.
but..
W(-1/(2e^(-3/2))) should be W(-1/(2e^(-5/2))),
but your working is correct!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K